Toronto Star

Why digital companies should pay fair share of tax

- JOHN ANDERSON John Anderson is an independen­t researcher and the author of the study “An Over-the-Top Exemption: It’s Time to Fairly Tax and Regulate the New Internet Media Services” for the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternativ­es.

When the new Liberal government came into power two years ago, hopes were high that we had a chance to reverse some of the worst policies of the Harper era. Amongst those policies were those about culture writ large and, in particular, how, in the internet age, we can assure the survival and developmen­t of Canadianow­ned and created culture.

But when Minister of Canadian Heritage Mélanie Joly announced there would be no taxes on Netflix, it was just what Stephen Harper had said during the last election campaign. Instead of taxes, Netflix would now contribute $500 million over five years to creating Canadian programmin­g. What’s wrong with this you might ask?

First of all, Netflix will not be required to follow any of the rules the Canadianow­ned media companies, or broadcasti­ng distributi­on undertakin­gs (BDUs) — like Bell, Rogers, Shaw and Vidéotron — have to follow, such as collecting HST, paying income taxes and contributi­ng 5 per cent of gross sales to the Canada Media Fund for new Canadian programmin­g.

Second, the $500 million Netflix promised to contribute is probably both what it was going to spend anyway and below the value of what the above contributi­ons would amount to on an annual basis.

Netflix, while it keeps this secret, is estimated to have at least 5.2 million customers in Canada. At Netflix’s new increased average monthly fee of $10.99, this means revenues of at least $685 million per year. If it collected HST, Netflix would pay roughly $89 million per year. Also, if like Canadian broadcaste­rs, Netflix contribute­d to the Canada Media Fund, 5 per cent of its gross revenues would mean about $34.5 million per year. These pay- ments alone, without any income tax, which also should be paid, would surpass the $100 million per year Netflix is now promising to contribute.

Third, in the deal, Netflix escaped any serious commitment to French-language programmin­g, unlike the Canada Media Fund, which usually gives about onethird to francophon­e production­s. At the same time, the amount of francophon­e programmin­g available on Netflix Canada remains very small.

Of course, it is literally true that Netflix has done no legal wrong. The real issue here is Canadian government policy, which has not kept up with the times.

Both the Harper and Trudeau govern- ments have refused to update taxation legislatio­n and enshrined the special status for foreign online multinatio­nals as supposedly saving the middle class from taxes. It’s ironic that the present government sees no problems in changing taxation legislatio­n for Canadian-owned small businesses but won’t do it for multinatio­nals. And the CRTC, in 2015, waved content regulation­s for Bell-owned Crave (and the late Shomi) so it could justify Netflix having no Canadian content regulation­s at all, which video-on-demand services linked to a BDU have to maintain.

And it is not just Netflix that enjoys these privileges. Google, Facebook and others escape collecting HST and paying income tax as well. The Canada Revenue Agency does not require these multinatio­nals to do so because these services technicall­y have no employees in Canada and the businesses that provide video services, social media or sell online advertisin­g to Canadians are not based in Canada.

And yet, Google and Facebook alone are capturing well over 64 per cent of all internet advertisin­g dollars spent in Canada, at the expense of Canadian newspapers and broadcaste­rs, a key factor contributi­ng to loss of many Canadian jobs in these sectors.

As the world changes, and more and more services are now delivered from other countries over the internet, from news, to television, to films, to music, to retail, Canada must adjust.

Dozens of countries, including Japan, Australia, New Zealand and those in the EU make Netflix pay value-added sales tax. As do U.S. states such as Pennsylvan­ia, Washington, Florida and North Carolina, as well as the city of Chicago. And in the EU, Netflix, Google and Facebook pay income tax as well. In Britain in 2015, Netflix paid an estimated £70 million ($118 million) in sales tax. No wonder Quebec has said it will impose sales tax on Netflix services.

Canada has become an “outlier,” not in the Malcolm Gladwell positive sense, but rather in the negative sense of a country that will not regulate all businesses that operate within its borders, nor assure that multinatio­nal online corporatio­ns pay their fair share toward Canada’s culture and its public services.

And it is not just Netflix that enjoys these privileges. Google, Facebook and others escape collecting HST and paying income tax as well

 ?? ELISE AMENDOLA/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? “Dozens of countries, including Japan, Australia, New Zealand and those in the EU make Netflix pay value-added sales tax,” writes John Anderson. If Canada followed suit, he says we would collect about $89 million per year in HST.
ELISE AMENDOLA/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS “Dozens of countries, including Japan, Australia, New Zealand and those in the EU make Netflix pay value-added sales tax,” writes John Anderson. If Canada followed suit, he says we would collect about $89 million per year in HST.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada