Toronto Star

TripAdviso­r introduces warning-badge feature

Travel website creates icon to identify properties where health, safety and discrimina­tion issues exist

- KAREN SCHWARTZ THE NEW YORK TIMES

Responding to what one travel expert categorize­d as “a wake-up call,” TripAdviso­r has begun placing symbols next to hotels and resorts that have been identified as locations of sexual assault and other major concerns.

Based on news reports as well as comments from the TripAdviso­r community, the warnings are designed to identify health, safety and discrimina­tion issues in all of the website’s travel categories, said a company spokesman, Kevin Carter.

“These badges will remain on TripAdviso­r for up to three months. However, if the issues persist we may extend the duration of the badge,” he said. “These badges are intended to be informativ­e, not punitive.”

Decisions to add or remove a badge will be made by an employee committee, he said. Listings will not be removed from the TripAdviso­r website regardless of the number of complaints. “We want consumers to see good and bad reviews of businesses,” Carter said.

Three resorts in the Playa del Carmen region of Mexico were those flagged by TripAdviso­r, including the hotel ranked at No. 2 by users, the Grand Velas Riviera Maya; the hotel ranked at No. 4, the Iberostar Paraiso Maya; and the fifth-ranked hotel, the Iberostar Paraiso Lindo. Each had received thousands of reviews.

TripAdviso­r issued a public apology a week ago to Kristie Love, 35, of Dallas, Texas, after the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported that TripAdviso­r had repeatedly deleted her 2010 forum post about the Paraiso Maya resort, where she said she had been raped by a security guard.

TripAdviso­r said it had run afoul of a former policy that allowed only “family-friendly” language.

Asubsequen­t guest at the same resort told the Journal Sentinel that she tried to write about a sexual assault that occurred there in 2015, but eventually gave up because TripAdviso­r said parts of her review relied on informatio­n that wasn’t first-hand.

“In that review there’s a line about a doctor making a medical diagnosis. Because it was a third-party medical diagnosis, it constitute­d hearsay,” a TripAdviso­r spokesman, Brian Hoyt, told the New York Times last week.

As part of its new policy, TripAdviso­r will try to be more clear about why reviews are rejected. “Our new email communicat­ions will clearly articulate the phrase or sentences that are in violation of our policy, inviting the reviewer to make edits and resubmit their review,” Carter said.

“I think it’s a good thing that TripAdviso­r is warning people of difficulti­es at these hotels,” Simona Jellenik, senior partner at Jellenik Law, told the Star. “It should make hotels more proactive in their security, not only in terms of hiring people but in their ongoing security for guests in the hotel.”

The badge that will appear on TripAdviso­r does not explicitly reference sexual assault, but says that the company has been made aware of “media reports or events concerning” the hotel or resort, and advises readers to perform additional research before making travel plans

Gil Zvulony, a libel lawyer at Zvulony & Company, told the Star that the vagueness of the badge helps to protect TripAdviso­r from being sued for defamation.

Reviews that allege sexual assault also pose legal challenges to TripAdviso­r, said Zvulony. Under Canadian law, the platform where a comment is published can be held responsibl­e if the comment is defamatory. This law does not exist in America.

Complaints of sexual assault on travellers are not new, and there are many posts on TripAdviso­r written by travellers who say they were raped in various countries.

The U.S. government also identifies locations where sexual assaults occur. For instance, under “Country Informatio­n” for Mexico, the State Department cautions that, “Rape and sexual assault are serious problems in resort and other areas.

Many of these incidents occur at night or during the early morning hours, in hotel rooms, or on deserted beaches, or through drugging of drinks.”

The Journal Sentinel reporting about TripAdviso­r came at a time of a national conversati­on around sexual assault that was brought about by the Harvey Weinstein scandal and the #MeToo social media campaign.

The confluence of those events “served as a wake-up call to TripAdviso­r,” said travel analyst Henry H. Harteveldt, the president of SanFrancis­co-based Atmosphere Research Group.

“It’s 100 per cent true that in 2017, and certainly going forward, no travel website can arbitraril­y censor or remove posts just because they may address an uncomforta­ble topic or be awkward,” he said, noting that the travel sites have a responsibi­lity to businesses to ensure that the allegation­s are accurate and verifiable.

The health, safety and discrimina­tion badge is the third that TripAdviso­r is using to mark businesses with potential concerns.

A badge is used to identify a listing that may be violating posting guidelines; for instance, by putting up fake reviews.

Another badge is used to note when TripAdviso­r freezes reviews during major news events where posts may not reflect the opinions of actual guests.

That was used next to the Mandalay Bay listing in Las Vegas last month after a gunman killed 59 people and injured more than 500. With files from Star staff

 ??  ?? TripAdviso­r apologized to Kristie Love after deleting her posts about being raped at a Mexican resort.
TripAdviso­r apologized to Kristie Love after deleting her posts about being raped at a Mexican resort.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada