Toronto Star

HARVEY WEINSTEIN IS MY MONSTER

Salma Hayek writes of the harassment she endured at the hands of disgraced mogul while making the film Frida,

-

Harvey Weinstein was a passionate cinephile, a risk taker, a patron of talent in film, a loving father and a monster. For years, he was my monster. This fall, I was approached by reporters, through different sources, including my dear friend Ashley Judd, to speak about an episode in my life that, although painful, I thought I had made peace with.

I had brainwashe­d myself into thinking that it was over and that I had survived; I hid from the responsibi­lity to speak out with the excuse that enough people were already involved in shining a light on my monster. I didn’t consider my voice important, nor did I think it would make a difference.

In reality, I was trying to save myself the challenge of explaining several things to my loved ones: Why, when I had casually mentioned I had been bullied like many others by Harvey, I had excluded a couple of details. And why, for so many years, we have been cordial to a man who hurt me so deeply. I had been proud of my capacity for forgivenes­s, but the mere fact that I was ashamed to describe the details of what I had forgiven made me wonder if that chapter of my life had really been resolved. When so many women came forward to describe what Harvey had done, I had to confront my cowardice and humbly accept that my story, as important as it was to me, was nothing but a drop in an ocean of sorrow and confusion. I felt that by now nobody would care about my pain — maybe this was an effect of the many times I was told, especially by Harvey, that I was nobody.

We are finally becoming conscious of a vice that has been socially accepted and has insulted and humiliated millions of girls like me, for in every woman there is a girl. I am inspired by those who had the courage to speak out, especially in a society that elected a president who has been accused of sexual harassment and assault by more than a dozen women and whom we have all heard say a man in power can do anything he wants to women. Well, not anymore. In the14 years that I stumbled from schoolgirl to Mexican soap star to an extra in a few American films to catching a couple of lucky breaks in Desperado and Fools Rush In, Harvey Weinstein had become the wizard of a new wave of cinema that took original content into the mainstream. At the same time, it was unimaginab­le for a Mexican actress to aspire to a place in Hollywood. And even though I had proven them wrong, I was still a nobody.

One force that gave me the determinat­ion to pursue my career was the story of Frida Kahlo, who in the golden age of the Mexican muralists would do small intimate paintings that everybody looked down on. She had the courage to express herself while disregardi­ng skepticism. My greatest ambition was to tell her story. It became my mission to portray the life of this extraordin­ary artist and to show my native Mexico in a way that combated stereotype­s.

The Weinstein empire, which was then Miramax, had become synonymous with quality, sophistica­tion and risk taking — a haven for artists who were complex and defiant. It was everything that Frida was to me and everything I aspired to be.

I knew Harvey a little through my relationsh­ip with the director Robert Rodriguez and the producer Elizabeth Avellan, who was then his wife, with whom I had done several films and who had taken me under their wing. All I knew of Harvey was that he had a remarkable intellect, he was a loyal friend and a family man. Knowing what I know now, I wonder if it wasn’t my friendship with them — and Quentin Tarantino and George Clooney — that saved me from being raped.

The deal we made initially was that Harvey would pay for the rights of work I had already developed. As an actress, I would be paid the minimum Screen Actors Guild scale plus 10 per cent. As a producer, I would receive a credit that would not yet be defined, but no payment, which was not that rare for a female producer in the ’90s. He also demanded a signed deal for me to do several other films with Miramax, which I thought would cement my status as a leading lady.

I was so excited to work with him and that company. In my naïveté, I thought my dream had come true. He had validated the last 14 years of my life. He had taken a chance on me — a nobody. He had said yes.

Little did I know it would become my turn to say no.

No to opening the door to him at all hours of the night, hotel after hotel, location after location, where he would show up unexpected­ly, including one location where I was doing a movie he wasn’t involved with. No to me taking a shower with him. No to letting him watch me take a shower.

No to letting him give me a massage.

No to letting a naked friend of his give me a massage. No to letting him give me oral sex. No to my getting naked with another woman. No, no, no, no, no . . . And with every refusal came Harvey’s Machiavell­ian rage.

I don’t think he hated anything more than “no.” The absurdity of his demands went from getting a furious call in the middle of the night asking me to fire my agent for a fight he was having with him about a different movie with a different client to physically dragging me out of the opening gala of the Venice Film Festival, which was in honour of Frida, so I could hang out at his private party.

The range of his persuasion tactics went from sweet-talking me to that one time when, in an attack of fury, he said the terrifying words, “I will kill you, don’t think I can’t.”

When he was finally convinced I was not going to earn the movie the way he expected, he told me he had offered my role and my script to another actress.

In his eyes, I was not an artist. I wasn’t even a person. I was a thing: not a nobody, but a body.

I had to resort to using lawyers, not by pursuing a harassment case, but by claiming “bad faith,” as I had worked so hard on a movie he did not intend to make or sell back to me.

He claimed that my name as an actress was not big enough and that I was incompeten­t as a producer, but to clear himself legally, as I understood it, he gave me a list of impossible tasks with a tight deadline:

1. Get a rewrite of the script, with no additional payment.

2. Raise $10 million to finance the film. 3. Attach an A-list director. 4. Cast four of the smaller roles with prominent actors.

Much to everyone’s amazement, not least my own, I delivered, thanks to a phalanx of angels who came to my rescue, including Edward Norton, who beautifull­y rewrote the script several times and appallingl­y never got credit, and my friend Mar- garet Perenchio, a first-time producer, who put up the money. The brilliant Julie Taymor agreed to direct, and from then on she became my rock. For the other roles, I recruited my friends Antonio Banderas, Edward Norton and my dear Ashley Judd. To this day, I don’t know how I convinced Geoffrey Rush, whom I barely knew at the time.

Now Harvey Weinstein was not only rejected but also about to do a movie he did not want to do.

Once we began filming, the harassment stopped but the rage escalated. We paid the price for standing up to him nearly every day of shooting.

Halfway through shooting, Harvey turned up on set and complained about Frida’s “unibrow.” He insisted I eliminate the limp and berated my performanc­e. Then he asked everyone in the room to step out except me. He told me the only thing I had going for me was my sex appeal and that there was none of that in this movie. So he told me he was going to shut down the film because no one would want to see me in that role.

It was soul crushing because, I confess, lost in the fog of a sort of Stockholm syndrome, I wanted him to see me as an artist: not only as a capable actress but also as somebody who could identify a compelling story and tell it in an original way.

I was hoping he would acknowledg­e me as a producer, who on top of delivering his list of demands shepherded the script and obtained the permits to use the paintings. I had negotiated with the Mexican government, and with whomever I had to, to get locations that had never been given to anyone in the past — including Frida Kahlo’s houses and the murals of Kahlo’s husband, Diego Rivera, among others.

But all of this seemed to have no value. The only thing he noticed was that I was not sexy in the movie. He made me doubt if I was any good as an actress, but he never succeeded in making me think that the film was not worth making.

He offered me one option to continue: do a sex scene with another woman. And he demanded full-frontal nudity.

He had been constantly asking for more skin, more sex. Once before, Julie got him to settle for a tango ending in a kiss instead of the lovemaking scene he wanted us to shoot between the character Tina Modotti, played by Ashley, and Frida.

It was clear he would never let me finish this movie without him having his fantasy one way or another.

I felt an immense pressure to deliver and a deep sense of gratitude for all those who did believe in me and followed me into this madness. So I agreed to do the senseless scene.

I arrived on the set the day we were to shoot the scene that I believed would save the movie. And for the first and last time in my career, I had a nervous breakdown: My body began to shake uncontroll­ably, my breath was short and I began to cry and cry, unable to stop, as if I were throwing up tears. Since those around me had no knowledge of my history of Harvey, they were very surprised by my struggle that morning. It was not because I would be naked with another woman. It was because I would be naked with her for Harvey Weinstein. But I could not tell them then.

My mind understood I had to do it, but my body wouldn’t stop crying and convulsing. I started throwing up. I had to take a tranquiliz­er, which stopped the crying but made the vomiting worse. This was not sexy, but it was the only way I could get through the scene.

By the time filming was over, I was so distraught I had to distance myself during the post-production.

When Harvey saw the cut film, he said it was not good enough for a theatrical release and that he would send it straight to video.

This time Julie had to fight him without me and got him to agree to release the film in one movie theatre in New York if we tested it to an audience and scored at least an 80. Less than 10 per cent of films achieve that score on a first screening. I didn’t go to the test. I anxiously awaited the news. The film scored 85.

Harvey raged. In the lobby after the screening, he screamed at Julie. He balled up one of the scorecards and threw it at her. It bounced off her nose. Her partner, the film’s composer, Elliot Goldenthal, stepped in, and Harvey physically threatened him. I found the strength to call Harvey to ask him also to open the movie in a theatre in Los Angeles, which made a total of two theatres. He gave me that. I have to say sometimes he was kind, fun and witty — and that was part of the problem: You just never knew which Harvey you were going to get. In October 2002, this film, about my hero and inspiratio­n — this Mexican artist who never truly got acknowledg­ed in her time with her limp and her unibrow, this film that Harvey never wanted to do, gave him box-office success no one could have predicted, and despite his lack of support, added six Academy Award nomination­s to his collection, including best actress. Even though Frida won him two Oscars, I didn’t see any joy. He never offered me a starring role again. The films I was obliged to do under my original deal with Miramax were supporting roles.

Years l ater, when I ran into him at an event, he pulled me aside and told me he had stopped smoking and he had had a heart attack. He said he’d fallen in love and married Georgina Chapman, and that he was a changed man. “You did well with Frida; we did a beautiful movie.”

I believed him. Harvey would never know how much those words meant to me. He also would never know how much he hurt me. I never showed Harvey how terrified I was of him. When I saw him socially, I’d smile and try to remember the good things about him, telling myself that I went to war and I won.

But why do so many of female artists have to go to war to tell our stories when we have so much to offer? Why do we have to fight tooth and nail to maintain our dignity?

It is because we, as women, have been devalued artistical­ly to an indecent state, to the point where the film industry stopped making an effort to find out what female audiences wanted to see and what stories we wanted to tell.

Between 2007 and 2016, four per cent of directors were female and 80 per cent of those got the chance to make only one film. In 2016, 27 per cent of words spoken in the biggest movies were spoken by women.

And people wonder why you didn’t hear our voices sooner. The statistics are self-explanator­y: our voices are not welcome.

Until there is equality in our industry, with men and women having the same value in every aspect of it, our community will continue to be a fertile ground for predators.

I am grateful for everyone listening to our experience­s. I hope adding my voice to the chorus will shed light on why it is so difficult, and why so many of us have waited so long. Men sexually harassed because they could. Women are talking today because, in this new era, we finally can.

People wonder why you didn’t hear women’s voices sooner. Our voices are not welcome

 ??  ??
 ?? GETTY IMAGES FOR AFI (TOP)/ MIRAMAX ?? In photo at right, Hayek and Ashley Judd dance a tango in a scene from Frida (2002). Judd was one of the first accusers of Harvey Weinstein.
GETTY IMAGES FOR AFI (TOP)/ MIRAMAX In photo at right, Hayek and Ashley Judd dance a tango in a scene from Frida (2002). Judd was one of the first accusers of Harvey Weinstein.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada