Toronto Star

PRODUCTIVI­TY PARADOX

A Microsoft survey found technology — including cat videos — is keeping people from work,

- JEREMY KAHN BLOOMBERG

LONDON— Economists have been puzzled in recent years by the socalled “productivi­ty paradox,” the fact that the digital revolution of the past four decades hasn’t resulted in big gains in output per worker as happened with earlier technologi­cal upheaval.

Many developed economies have actually seen productivi­ty stagnate or decline.

A survey from Microsoft Corp. is bolstering one theory about this disconnect.

In a poll of 20,000 European workers released Monday, Microsoft, which became one of the world’s most profitable companies by marketing office productivi­ty software, acknowledg­es new digital technology can, in some circumstan­ces, make businesses less productive. Redmond, Wash.-based Microsoftj­oins a growing number of prominent Silicon Valley companies and entreprene­urs that are starting to question the social benefits of the technology they once championed. Facebook Inc. warned in December that its social network might, in some cases, cause psychologi­cal harm.

Microsoft identifies a number of possible reasons for this negative impact, including: workers who are too distracted by a constant influx of e-mails, Slack messages, Trello notificati­ons, texts, tweets — not to mention viral cat videos — to concentrat­e for sustained periods; workers who aren’t properly trained to use the new technology effectivel­y; tech that isn’t adequately supported by the business, forcing workers to lose time because “the computers are down”; and workers who suffer burnout because, with mobile devices and at-home working, they feel tethered to the job around-the-clock.

Of course, Microsoft isn’t saying that technology dampens productivi­ty in all cases.

Instead, it says that tech’s impact depends largely on the culture of the business.

Those with a “strong digital culture” saw productivi­ty gains from technology, while those with what Microsoft termed a “weak digital culture” didn’t.

Microsoft defined companies with a strong digital culture as those where employees had proper training in the new technology, access to informatio­n, managers who promoted the adoption of new technology and where executives conveyed to employees a clear sense of how the technology fit into the company’s strategic vision.

In such businesses, about 22 per cent of employees reported feeling highly productive and only about 5 per cent reported feeling unproducti­ve, compared with just 12 per cent reporting they were highly productive and 21 per cent feeling unproducti­ve in companies deemed to have a weak digital culture.

The study’s authors noted that even 22 per cent reporting high productivi­ty “suggests there is still more work that can be done to help every employee do their best work.”

 ??  ??
 ?? DREAMSTIME VIA SEATTLE TIMES ?? Microsoft says that technology’s impact on productivi­ty depends on the culture of the business.
DREAMSTIME VIA SEATTLE TIMES Microsoft says that technology’s impact on productivi­ty depends on the culture of the business.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada