Toronto Star

Lululemon sues hundreds of online counterfei­ters

Lawsuit claims foreign websites deceiving customers by selling fake apparel at discount prices

- ROBERT CHANNICK CHICAGO TRIBUNE

CHICAGO— Lululemon Athletica is suing an unidentifi­ed web of counterfei­ters for allegedly selling knockoff yoga pants online.

The trademark infringeme­nt lawsuit, filed Monday in federal court in Chicago, claims hundreds of websites are diluting Vancouver-based Lululemon’s brand and deceiving consumers with fake leggings, sports bras and other apparel offered at steep discounts. The company’s lawsuit alleges the counterfei­ters are based in China “or other foreign jurisdicti­ons.”

“The success of the Lululemon brand has resulted in its significan­t counterfei­ting,” the lawsuit says. “Despite Lululemon’s enforcemen­t efforts, defendants have persisted in creating the . . . internet stores.”

Beyond aggressive­ly marked-down activewear bearing Lululemon-branded names, the counterfei­t websites have “virtually identical layouts” and share similar irregulari­ties, including “the same incorrect grammar and misspellin­gs,” according to the lawsuit.

Lululemon and a Chicago attorney representi­ng the company in the suit declined to comment Tuesday.

Founded in1998, Lululemon helped create and grow the market for so-called athleisure wear — athletic apparel that is also favoured as streetwear. The company reported more than $300 million (U.S.) in net income on $2.3 billion in revenue for 2016, according to its most recent annual report.

Lululemon had 388 companyown­ed retail stores at the end of the third quarter, including about a dozen in the Chicago area.

It also sells merchandis­e through its website, which was the primary driver of a 13-per-cent increase in direct-to-consumer revenue in 2016, according to the company.

The trademark lawsuit is seeking to shut down the alleged fake websites and award Lululemon “all profits realized” by the defendants or statutory damages of $2 million for each alleged misappropr­iation of Lululemon trademarks.

The company is also seeking an order that the domain names for the counterfei­t websites be transferre­d to its control.

Last month, Canada Goose, the trendy Toronto-based outerwear manufactur­er, filed a similar lawsuit against alleged Chinese counterfei­ters, accusing them of selling fake jackets online.

A Chicago federal judge last year awarded rival Canadian outerwearm­aker Moose Knuckles $52 million in damages and control of 33 websites accused of selling knock-off parkas.

The sale of alleged counterfei­t apparel isn’t the only issue facing Lululemon. On Monday, the company announced that CEO Laurent Potdevin resigned after he “fell short” of standards of conduct, with three senior executives elevated to take over his responsibi­lities, according to a news release. The board, led by executive chairman Glenn Murphy, has begun a search for a new leader. With a file from Bloomberg

 ?? DREAMSTIME ?? Lululemon’s lawsuit, filed Monday, claims the counterfei­t websites have “virtually identical layouts” and share similar irregulari­ties.
DREAMSTIME Lululemon’s lawsuit, filed Monday, claims the counterfei­t websites have “virtually identical layouts” and share similar irregulari­ties.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada