Toronto Star

Dermatolog­ist’s licence revoked

Claimed size of his belly made allegation­s of abuse impossible

- JACQUES GALLANT LEGAL AFFAIRS REPORTER

Ontario’s medical regulator has revoked the licence of a Barrie dermatolog­ist who argued there was no way he could have rubbed his penis against his female patients because of his large belly.

The majority of a panel of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario’s discipline committee found in a decision released Tuesday that the penalty of revocation was mandatory, given that Dr. Rodion Kunynetz had been found guilty by the panel last year of sexual abuse by groping one patient’s breasts.

The panel had been unable to conclude — after expert examinatio­ns — whether Kunynetz’s penis had actually made contact with patients.

But what the panel did find was that it was not impossible, and that there was contact between the patients “and that part of Dr. Kunynetz’s lower abdomen at the level of his pelvis, and that the patients were distressed by this.” That part is known as an abdominal panniculus, or “abdominal fat pad.”

Profession­al misconduct findings were levelled against Kunynetz for failing to give a warning or excuse for that contact.

In addition to having his licence revoked, Kunynetz was ordered to post credit for $16,000 to cover potential therapy costs for patients, as well as pay the college $145,000 in costs for the discipline proceeding­s.

A lawyer for Kunynetz said he filed a notice of appeal in Divisional Court last year, of the discipline committee’s decision finding the doctor guilty of sexual abuse and profession­al misconduct, and that Tuesday’s penalty decision is being reviewed.

“Dr. Kunynetz may amend his notice of appeal to address errors in the penalty decision,” Matthew Sammon said.

“Given the extant notice of appeal, we are not in a position to make any further comment at this time.”

A number of patients had testified at Kunynetz’s discipline hearing that he rubbed his penis against their legs during examinatio­ns, an allegation that Kunynetz argued was physically impossible.

Urological experts were hired by both the college and the doctor’s defence team to chemically induce erections in Kunynetz and then simulate patient examinatio­ns to determine if indeed his penis could be felt against a patient’s leg.

After conflictin­g results from the two experts and after consulting photograph­ic evidence from one of the procedures, the discipline panel could only conclude “that the impossibil­ity of contact between the doctor’s penis and a patient’s skin (through clothing) was not establishe­d.”

In its penalty decision released Tuesday, the panel acknowledg­ed that the Kunynetz case had attracted much publicity that could be described as “extremely unpleasant, stressful and even salacious,” but it was largely a consequenc­e of Kunynetz’s chosen defence.

“The cumulative effect of Dr. Kunynetz’s misconduct, including both sexual abuse and disgracefu­l, dishonoura­ble and unprofessi­onal conduct, is to undermine public trust in the integrity of the profession of medicine,” the panel said.

“When the committee viewed Dr. Kunynetz’s misconduct in light of changes in public and profession­al values, the multiplici­ty of findings and Dr. Kunynetz’s lack of acknowledg­ement of the consequenc­es of his actions, the committee concluded that the penalty of revocation was appropriat­e and necessary.”

Kunynetz still faces a separate discipline hearing later this year for profession­al misconduct allegation­s involving 30 patients, 18 of whose claims also include sexual abuse allegation­s.

Changes to provincial legislatio­n that came into effect last May— after Kunynetz had been found guilty by the panel at his first discipline hearing of sexual abuse and profession­al misconduct — required that healthcare profession­als found guilty of groping their patients have their licences automatica­lly revoked.

The majority of the discipline panel found that the changes are retroactiv­e and applied them to Kunynetz’s case, although they concluded that they would have revoked his licence even if the amendments did not apply. A dissenting member of the panel, Peter Pielsticke­r, disagreed that the changes are retroactiv­e, but nonetheles­s concluded that revocation was necessary in this case “given the seriousnes­s of the sexual abuse finding.”

Kunynetz already had been suspended by the college since October 2015, pending the outcome of the discipline proceeding­s.

The doctor is set to stand trial in criminal court in Barrie beginning March 19 on two counts of sexual assault, according to courthouse staff.

He faces a further trial in December on another sexual assault charge. Those allegation­s have not yet been proven in court.

A number of patients had testified at Kunynetz’s discipline hearing that he rubbed his penis against their legs during examinatio­ns

 ?? BERNARD WEIL/TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO ?? Dr. Rodion Kunynetz was ordered to post $16,000 to cover potential therapy for patients, and pay the College of Physicians $145,000 in costs.
BERNARD WEIL/TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO Dr. Rodion Kunynetz was ordered to post $16,000 to cover potential therapy for patients, and pay the College of Physicians $145,000 in costs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada