Toronto Star

Documents show ‘outside push’ to alter planning for new GO sites

Del Duca backed two more locations that were rejected by Metrolinx

- BEN SPURR TRANSPORTA­TION REPORTER

The former provincial transporta­tion minister sought the approval of a total of four new GO Transit stations that studies recommende­d against, amid what Metrolinx staff acknowledg­ed internally could be seen as an “outside push” to alter planning evidence at the agency.

As the Star has reported, documents obtained through a freedom of informatio­n request show that in June 2016 the transporta­tion ministry, which was then led by MPP Steven Del Duca, pressured Metrolinx, the arm’s length agency responsibl­e for transporta­tion planning in the GTHA, into approving the constructi­on of Kirby and Lawrence East GO stations. A report commission­ed by the agency had recommende­d neither be considered for at least another 10 years.

Those documents were partially redacted. The Star has since obtained unredacted versions that indicate Del Duca attempted to win approval for two other new GO stops that weren’t supported by studies: Park Lawn in South Etobicoke, and Highway 7-Concord in Vaughan.

The Star has also obtained internal Metrolinx correspond­ence about the newspaper’s initial informatio­n request, which was filed last year. The correspond­ence includes drafts of briefing notes prepared by agency communicat­ions staff in 2017 that flagged potential issues that could arise from documents about the station approval process being published.

“A couple of months ago, Metrolinx began a thorough review of all new GO stations. I look forward to seeing the results.” STEVEN DEL DUCA FORMER TRANSPORTA­TION MINISTER IN EMAIL TO THE STAR

Taken together the documents paint a clearer picture of how Metrolinx’s planning process was derailed by Del Duca’s directives, and how the agency prepared to deal with the fallout of the interferen­ce being revealed in the media.

Following the pressure from the transporta­tion ministry, Metrolinx altered reports to recommend Kirby and Lawrence East, and the agency’s board approved them as part of a proposed 12-stop expansion under GO’s $13.5-billion regional express rail program.

Kirby is in Del Duca’s riding in Vaughan and Lawrence East in Scarboroug­h is a critical part of Mayor John Tory’s SmartTrack plan.

However, Metrolinx did not change its stance on Park Lawn or Highway 7-Concord, and those two stations were not approved.

Del Duca is no longer at the transporta­tion ministry. In January, Premier Kathleen Wynne appointed him minister of economic developmen­t as part of a Liberal government cabinet shuffle.

The minister would not answer specific questions put to him by the Star about the station approval process.

“A couple of months ago, Metrolinx began a thorough review of all new GO stations,” he said in an emailed statement.

“I look forward to seeing the results.”

As the Star has previously reported, by June 2016, after spending a year and a half studying potential new station sites, Metrolinx had landed on a list of 10 that staff planned to recommend to the agency’s board. Kirby, Lawrence East, Park Lawn and Highway 7-Concord were not on the list.

Three weeks before a June 28, 2016, meeting, at which the Metrolinx board was set to decide on the new stations, agency officials briefed Del Duca on the plans.

On June 9, 2016, Bruce McCuaig, then Metrolinx’s chief executive officer, wrote an email to Rob Prichard, chair of the agency’s board, saying the briefing had gone “so-so.”

McCuaig believed Del Duca was “disappoint­ed” by the exclusion of Kirby and Highway 7-Concord. Two days later, McCuaig wrote that he was “trying to see if there is a credible way to improve the business case” for Kirby.

In a draft briefing note prepared in 2017, a Metrolinx staffer analyzing the correspond­ence acknowledg­ed that from McCuaig’s statement it “can be perceived that there is an outside push to change the business case” the arms-length agency had commission­ed.

McCuaig’s effort to improve the Kirby business case was unsuccessf­ul and, on June 15, 2016, the Metrolinx board met behind closed doors and endorsed the 10-stop list without any additions.

However, on June 16, 2016, the transporta­tion ministry sent Metrolinx draft news releases that indicated Del Duca planned to announce Kirby, Lawrence East, Park Lawn and Highway 7-Concord would go ahead.

Senior Metrolinx officials were shocked and scrambled to get clar- ification from the government. A day later, after speaking to a policy adviser at the ministry, McCuaig reported to Prichard that “M apparently wants us to include Lawrence, Park Lawn, Concord and Kirby.”

McCuaig would not confirm to the Star whether “M” referred to the minister personally or the ministry. But a July 2017 internal Metrolinx briefing note reveals that in its own analysis, agency officials understood “M” referred to Del Duca himself.

McCuaig has since left Metrolinx to take an advisory role at the federal government’s Canada Infrastruc­ture Bank. He declined to answer questions for this story.

In the days after McCuaig reported the minister’s wishes to Prichard, Metrolinx officials changed the recommenda­tions in a staff report going before the board to include Kirby and Lawrence East. The board reconvened on June 28, 2016, this time in public, and approved the two contentiou­s stops, plus the original list of 10.

One of the draft briefing notes prepared by Metrolinx in 2017 flagged as significan­t the fact that the records show McCuaig “took the lead . . . to modify the recommenda­tions to accommodat­e the minister’s direction.”

This internal assessment that the CEO altered staff advice at the minister’s request differs from Metrolinx’s public statements. Last year, the agency told the Star that Del Duca, along with local officials, had merely “made the case” that Kirby be included and, “after considerat­ion, Metrolinx’s leadership concurred.”

None of the documents reveal why Metrolinx didn’t approve Park Lawn and Highway 7-Concord. Neither Metrolinx nor Del Duca addressed the question when it was put to them by the Star.

Both stops have strong support from local politician­s, despite not being recommende­d by the planning studies.

Park Lawn would be on GO’s Lakeshore West line and serve the rapidly developing Humber Bay Shores community.

The stop would cost an estimated $177.9 million to construct and would be just 1.3 kilometres east of the existing Mimico GO station.

That’s less than the agency’s minimum spacing requiremen­t of 1.5 kilometres, and an initial business case for Park Lawn determined adding a second stop so close was “not an option.” Instead, building the new stop would be conditiona­l on removing Mimico.

While Park Lawn would probably attract more riders than Mimico, the latter was already undergoing a $55-million renovation. The report concluded that demolishin­g Mimico would go against provincial policy, and the potential benefits of Park Lawn were “not nearly enough to offset the capital costs” of a new stop. The Highway 7-Concord stop would be just east of Keele St. and Highway 7 in Vaughan, in the provincial riding that borders Del Duca’s and is represente­d by Ontario PC MPP Gila Martow. York Region and the City of Vaughan have endorsed plans for the new station, which would cost roughly $130 million.

An initial business case determined that the additional time it would take for trains to stop at Highway 7-Concord would deter riders further north on the Barrie line from taking GO, resulting in a net loss of 2,900 daily riders. Over a 60-year period, the resulting shift toward car travel would cost the region $1.2 billion in transporta­tion and environmen­tal costs.

A subsequent report that ranked all the shortliste­d station sites categorize­d Highway 7-Concord as one of the “low performing” stops that should not be considered for at least another 10 years.

Although the station business case studies and the ranking report were drafted before the board vote, Metrolinx didn’t release them until months later, long after Del Duca had publicly announced the 12 new stations at a series of press conference­s.

After the Star’s initial investigat­ion regarding Kirby and Lawrence East, Metrolinx pledged to be more transparen­t by releasing reports before board decisions, and publishing the minutes of closed-door board meetings.

In September, the agency put Kirby and Lawrence East under review. Phil Verster, Metrolinx’s new CEO, has since expanded the exercise to include all 19 stations that made the final round of considerat­ion. An update is expected to go to the board on March 8.

“Metrolinx is strengthen­ing the approach to evaluation (as well as transparen­cy) across a project’s life cycle in order to provide the board of directors and other decision makers with stronger guidance to make the best decisions,” Metrolinx spokespers­on Anne Marie Aikins said in an email.

“Most importantl­y though it will help our customers clearly understand the basis for these decisions.”

Kathryn McGarry, the new transporta­tion minister, defended Metrolinx’s station approval process, saying the decisions in June 2016 were the “result of initial business case analysis, extensive consultati­on with municipal and regional representa­tives, community engagement, and collaborat­ion between the ministry of transporta­tion and Metrolinx.”

 ??  ??
 ?? ANDREW FRANCIS WALLACE/TORONTO STAR ?? Steven Del Duca was reportedly “disappoint­ed” by the exclusion of Kirby and Highway 7-Concord in recommenda­tions made by Metrolinx in 2016.
ANDREW FRANCIS WALLACE/TORONTO STAR Steven Del Duca was reportedly “disappoint­ed” by the exclusion of Kirby and Highway 7-Concord in recommenda­tions made by Metrolinx in 2016.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada