Toronto Star

U.S. eyes restrainin­g orders to curb attacks

Guns could be confiscate­d from people deemed a risk

- JENNIFER JACOBS BLOOMBERG

WASHINGTON— The Trump administra­tion is considerin­g using restrainin­g orders to take guns away from people considered dangerous, two people familiar with the matter said.

Under extreme risk protection orders, firearms can be confiscate­d from people found to be at risk.

The administra­tion is studying an Indiana version of such a law, and is also considerin­g other measures, according to the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

U.S. President Donald Trump appeared to begin refining his proposals for combating school violence on Saturday, tweeting that arming teachers as a deterrent against such often deadly violence — an idea he championed in recent days — is “Up to States.”

“Armed Educators (and trusted people who work within a school) love our students and will protect them. Very smart people. Must be firearms adept & have annual training. Should get yearly bonus. Shootings will not happen again — a big & very inexpensiv­e deterrent. Up to States,” Trump tweeted.

The White House did not immediatel­y respond to a request for comment about the president’s tweet.

The White House has yet to offer a complete plan to address school violence amid the public outcry sparked by the Florida shooting, including addressing who would bear the financial cost.

At the White House Thursday, Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi described to Trump similar efforts in her state to allow law enforcemen­t agencies to seize firearms from people deemed to be a danger to themselves or others. “Good,” Trump responded. At a Florida town hall on CNN Wednesday, Republican Florida Sen. Marco Rubio said he supported restrainin­g orders.

Some gun rights groups have embraced the idea because it would not impose new regulation­s on firearms themselves.

California, Connecticu­t, Indiana, Oregon and Washington have laws that allow authoritie­s to temporaril­y take weapons away from people believed to be a danger to themselves or others.

Anyone subject to such an order would not be allowed to buy or otherwise obtain more guns while the order was in effect. The Trump administra­tion is looking at encouragin­g states to enact the legislatio­n, possibly by providing grants as a reward to states that adopt the idea, one of the people said.

Deputy Press Secretary Raj Shah said Thursday that the White House was looking at such laws.

The proposal came as the White House has been casting about for a response to widespread demands for action, including new gun laws, after the Feb. 14 shootings in a Parkland, Fla., high school in which 17 people died.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada