Toronto Star

Police must clear the air

-

There’s an old political adage, attributed to Ronald Reagan, that goes like this: “When you’re explaining, you’re losing.”

Toronto police Chief Mark Saunders has been doing all too much explaining this week in the wake of his comments in another newspaper about the investigat­ion into missing persons in the Church and Wellesley area.

A lot of people in the LGBTQ community took great exception to what they saw as a suggestion by the chief that they were somehow responsibl­e for the fact that a serial killer was able to operate, undetected, for years.

“We knew that people were missing and we didn’t have the right answers,” he said. “But nobody was coming to us with anything.”

Saunders now says he didn’t mean to point fingers and was trying to make a more general observatio­n about such complex investigat­ions. He’s been spending a lot of time explaining his remarks, in other words, and in the process he’s been losing credibilit­y with the public. In particular, he’s been damaging his force’s relationsh­ip with a community that is understand­ably traumatize­d by the revelation­s about accused killer Bruce McArthur.

The chief and the police services board urgently need to rebuild trust. They should start by committing to an independen­t review of how the Toronto force handled its investigat­ions into missing persons in the LGBTQ community in recent years.

Saunders says the force will conduct its own internal investigat­ion and promises to make the findings public.

That’s fine as far as it goes, but it doesn’t go far enough. The force’s relations with the LGBTQ community have been badly shaken, and it should agree to an independen­t review. At this point, an internal police probe alone won’t be enough to clear the air.

The McArthur case is truly appalling. He has now been charged with six counts of first-degree murder stretching over seven years, and there are fears that more people who went missing over the years around the Church-Wellesley neighbourh­ood may have fallen victim to a serial killer.

For all sorts of reasons it’s worth reviewing in detail how the police have handled the case and whether they did enough in response to earlier suspicions that a serial killer might be on the loose around Church and Wellesley. It’s not just a matter of assigning blame for any failures; it would be an opportunit­y to learn everything possible from a major, complicate­d crime that seems to have stretched over many years.

Chief Saunders himself says he would “support anything that enhances the trust and accountabi­lity factor of our organizati­on. I want to make sure, on the walk forward, that we get it right.”

Given that, he and the police services board would do themselves a favour by embracing rather than resisting calls for an independen­t review.

Those calls are growing louder as the extent of the McArthur case becomes clearer. A group called the Alliance for South Asian AIDS Prevention, for one, wants a review to consider whether the race or “perceived sexuality” of men who went missing around Church and Wellesley affected how much effort the police put into figuring out what happened to them.

That’s the kind of question an independen­t review could credibly address. Even if the Toronto force comes up with its own answer, it won’t be fully believed at this point where it matters most — in the very community that was allegedly targeted over many years by a serial killer.

We know how these things generally go: criticism mounts and the pressure builds for some sort of outside review. Finally, the organizati­on at the centre of the controvers­y (in this case, the Toronto police) concedes the need for an investigat­ion.

It would be far better to get ahead of all this and simply do the right thing. The police service should agree to an independen­t review of everything connected to the McArthur case. It should stop explaining and excusing and start leading.

Toronto police should agree to an independen­t review of everything related to the Bruce McArthur case

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada