Toronto Star

Recalling the ‘insanity’ in My Lai

50 years ago, U.S. soldiers killed 504 Vietnamese civilians in one of history’s worst military crimes

- IAN SHAPIRA

Early morning on March 16, 1968, helicopter­s carrying U.S. soldiers flew into a tiny village on the eastern side of South Vietnam, bordering the South China Sea. They’d arrived by a series of hamlets, known as My Lai, expecting to find a boobytrapp­ed stronghold of their enemy, the Viet Cong. Instead, all they saw were non-combatants: women, children, elderly men. Many of them were preparing for breakfast.

The Americans, about 100 soldiers from the Army’s Americal division, proceeded to massacre them. Over the next several hours, the civilians in My Lai and an adjacent settlement were shot and thrown in ditches. The body count: 504 people from more than 240 families. Some women were raped. Huts and homes were burned. Even the livestock was destroyed.

It was one of the worst American military crimes in history and still pierces the collective conscience of Vietnam War veterans. On Friday, an organizati­on called the Vietnam Peace Commemorat­ion Committee held a vigil in Lafayette Square across from the White House to acknowledg­e the American war crimes at My Lai.

Right after the attack, the soldiers — who had been told by their superiors the night before that everyone they’d see would be a Viet Cong guerrilla or sympathize­r — kept quiet about what they’d done. For more than a year and a half, the public wouldn’t know about the atrocity. Top military officials initially tried to keep a lid on the killings and commanders even touted the mission to the press as a tactical feat. A United Press Internatio­nal wire service account published in newspapers March 16 reported that U.S. infantryme­n “tangled with Communist forces threatenin­g the northern city of Quang Ngai Saturday and U.S. spokesmen reported 128 guerrillas slain in the bitter fighting.” But a few paragraphs later, the article, unwittingl­y, contained an ominous foreshadow­ing: “Details of the fighting near Quang Ngai were sketchy.”

Soon, a government whistleblo­wer and a promising journalist would expose the atrocity. In early 1969, Ronald Ridenhour, a veteran from Arizona, wrote a letter to the White House, Pentagon, State Department and numerous members of Congress, revealing his conversati­ons with soldiers who participat­ed or saw the attack. Ridenhour’s letter included details that made the allegation­s credible and worthy of investigat­ion, including map co-ordinates of My Lai, witness names and the identities of the perpetrato­rs, according to a congressio­nal probe.

Ridenhour’s letters sparked a military investigat­ion. By early September 1969, First Lt. William Laws Calley Jr., a 26-year- old college dropout from Miami who’d served as a platoon leader in the attack, was charged with the premeditat­ed murder of 109 civilians. But the military only released the fact that Calley had been accused of murdering an unspecifie­d number of people. Without knowing the magnitude of his crimes, the New York Times, for instance, only ran a fourparagr­aph Associated Press article on his arrest, running it on page 14. The press informatio­n officer “declined to give details of the case other than to say that the incident occurred in March, 1968, in Vietnam, and that the charge involves the deaths of more than one civilian,” according to the article.

Shortly after Calley had been charged, Seymour Hersh, a freelance reporter and former news aide to antiwar presidenti­al candidate Eugene McCarthy, learned about My Lai from a lawyer opposed to the war. But he only got vague outlines. He started sniffing around. Eventually, he approached a Pentagon source. As he recalled in a New Yorker piece three years ago, the official slapped his hand against his knee, and said, “That boy Calley didn’t shoot anyone higher than this.” Now Hersh had what he needed to crack the story wide open. Eventually, he found that tiny Times article noting Calley’s full name and arrest. Then he visited Calley at Fort Benning, Ga., where he was being held. Incredibly, the Army allowed Hersh to read and takes note from Calley’s classified charging sheet — the document that showed Calley had been accused of killing 109 people. Even more incredible was that when Hersh completed his exposé and took it to Life and Look magazines, the editors rejected him. So Hersh took his story to the Dispatch News Service, which he described to the New Yorker as “a small antiwar news agency” in Washington. The story broke on the wires Nov. 12, 1969, and appeared in newspapers the next day.

With a dateline from Fort Benning, Hersh began his story this way: “Lt. William L. Calley Jr., 26 years old, is a mild-mannered, boyish-looking Vietnam combat veteran with the nickname ‘Rusty.’ The Army is completing an investigat­ion of charges that he deliberate­ly murdered at least 109 Vietnamese civilians in a search-and-destroy mission in March1968 in a Viet Cong stronghold known as ‘Pinkville.’ ”

Calley told Hersh he was merely following orders. His attorney, George W. Latimer, a former judge on the U.S. Court of Military Appeals, ridiculed the accusation­s against his client. “This is one case that should never have been brought,” Latimer said. “Whatever killing there was in a firefight in connection with the operation. You can’t afford to guess whether a civilian is a Viet Cong or not. Either they shoot you or you shoot them.”

Calley was the only officer convicted of playing a direct role in the massacre.

On March 29, 1971, Calley was found guilty of the premeditat­ed murder of at least 22 Vietnamese civilians. He was sentenced to life in prison, but Nixon intervened and ordered that he serve under house arrest in a reduced sentence.

In early 1972, Hersh compiled all of his research and wrote a mammoth two-part series for the New Yorker. One soldier, Terry Reid of Milwaukee, described to Hersh what he’d seen when the onslaught erupted.

“As soon as they started opening up, it hit me that it was insanity. I walked to the rear. Pandemoniu­m broke loose. It sounded insane — machine guns, grenades. One of the guys walked back, and I remember him saying, ‘We got sixty women, kids, and some old men.’ ”

 ?? HAU DINH/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? My Lai massacre survivor Tran Van Duc with a photo taken by U.S. army photograph­er Ron Haeberle of his mother, Nguyen Thi Tau, who was killed in the massacre.
HAU DINH/THE ASSOCIATED PRESS My Lai massacre survivor Tran Van Duc with a photo taken by U.S. army photograph­er Ron Haeberle of his mother, Nguyen Thi Tau, who was killed in the massacre.
 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO ?? In this Nov. 16, 1969, file photo, the remains of the My Lai hamlets in South Vietnam.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS FILE PHOTO In this Nov. 16, 1969, file photo, the remains of the My Lai hamlets in South Vietnam.
 ??  ?? Seymour Hersh, who won a Pulitzer Prize for his stories about the My Lai massacre, in 1982.
Seymour Hersh, who won a Pulitzer Prize for his stories about the My Lai massacre, in 1982.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada