Toronto Star

Subway plan dysfunctio­nal, councillor says

- JENNIFER PAGLIARO CITY HALL BUREAU

A city councillor is calling for a public inquiry into the problemati­c Scarboroug­h subway planning process.

The $3.35-billion Scarboroug­h subway extension has been characteri­zed by a lack of informatio­n and misinforma­tion.

Now, Councillor Josh Matlow says this type of “dysfunctio­nal” transit planning needs to be put under a microscope.

“Our city now specialize­s in building transit that serve the least people for the most money,” the five-page request from Matlow says.

“The Spadina Extension and the Sheppard subway have monopolize­d scarce resources, leaving most residents of Scarboroug­h, North York and Etobicoke with long bus rides before being able to access rapid transit.”

“These bloated projects are plagued by low ridership, requiring significan­t subsidies,” Matlow says. “We are on the verge of making the same mistake.”

Council, under Mayor John Tory, has voted to move ahead with a one-stop Scarboroug­h subway extension from the existing Kennedy Station on the Bloor-Danforth line to a new stop at the Scarboroug­h Town Centre. That plan was revised from a three-stop option approved by council in 2013 under former mayor Rob Ford. In making that decision, council scrapped a seven-stop LRT that would have replaced the Scarboroug­h RT, be separated from traffic, and have been fully funded by the province.

All Toronto homeowners are paying for the subway through a special tax that will continue to be collected for at least 30 years.

Matlow’s request for a judicial review, which will be tabled at a council meeting next week, follows a Star story about how staff exaggerate­d the design of the subway, consultant­s rushed work and costs were based on hand-drawn sketches ahead of a key vote in July 2016.

The motion asks that council apply to the Superior Court under the City of Toronto Act to investigat­e what council was told about the subway extension and LRT alternativ­e in the lead-up to that vote.

Matlow’s motion includes details of how city staff claimed the design of the subway was at 5 per cent, while the LRT was at a similar stage of 5 to 10 per cent design — which cast the subway in a more favourable light at a time its cost was ballooning. The subway, internal re- ports provided to the Star show, was not that far along, and according to public reports, the LRT was actually at 30 per cent — putting it years ahead in the process.

His motion also outlines how a misleading TTC briefing note, which cast doubt on whether the LRT was still feasible, was distribute­d to only the mayor’s office and that of TTC chair Councillor Josh Colle against council procedure. That briefing note was used to influence council ahead of the vote.

Significan­tly, the briefing note said the LRT would now cost nearly as much as the subway because of constructi­on delays and other calculatio­ns.

An investigat­ion into the briefing note by the city’s auditor general, who said she found no evidence staff deliberate­ly misled council, also found the cost quot- ed was off by at least $570 million.

Staff also based cost estimates for the subway on a completion date in late 2025. That schedule was based on council approving the route for the subway at the meeting in July 2016 — a fact buried in a footnote below a chart on costs. But staff had not yet recommende­d a route for the subway, making it impossible for councillor­s to make a decision and for staff to meet that schedule.

“The evidence suggests that critical informatio­n presented to council by staff regarding the (Scarboroug­h subway extension) and the (Scarboroug­h LRT) in staff reports, briefing notes, and on the floor of council was at times inaccurate, misleading or incomplete,” Matlow’s motion concludes. “This is deeply troubling given that a decision on a multibilli­on dollar infrastruc­ture project was based on the informatio­n provided.”

Matlow has frequently criticized the lack of evidence to justify a subway and has advocated for the return to an LRT plan that would put more people closer to rapid transit stops. His motion is seconded by Councillor Kristyn WongTam.

 ??  ?? Councillor Josh Matlow says staff informatio­n was “inaccurate, misleading, or incomplete.”
Councillor Josh Matlow says staff informatio­n was “inaccurate, misleading, or incomplete.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada