Too much sitting is bad for your memory, study suggests
If you want to take a good stroll down memory lane, new research suggests you’d better get out of that chair more often.
In a first-of-its-kind study, researchers have found that in people middle-aged and older, a brain structure that is key to learning and memory is plumpest in those who spend the most time standing up and moving. At every age, prolonged sitters show less thickness in the medial temporal lobe and the subregions that make it up, the study found.
The prospect of thinning in the brain’s medial temporal lobe should spark plenty of worry.
Some loss of volume in this region occurs naturally as we age, and the result is poorer episodic memory — which brings to mind events in one’s past.
But shrinkage of the brain and its memory centres becomes particularly pronounced in dementia, and thinning of the cortex probably contributes to that. Even before Alzheimer’s disease steals memories, the condition begins to change the density and volume of the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex, memory-making structures that lie at the heart of the medial temporal lobe.
The findings are based on interviews and tests of 35 cognitively healthy people between the ages of 45 and 75. Researchers at UCLA’s Semel Institute and its Center for Cognitive Neurosciences queried the volunteers about their physical activity patterns and scanned their brains in an MRI. Then they gauged how selfreported sitting time or physical activity levels corresponded to thickness in these critical brain structures.
The study subjects reported average sitting times of three to 15 hours a day. After adjusting for their subjects’ ages, the researchers found that every additional hour of average daily sitting was associat- ed with a 2-per-cent decrease in the thickness of the medial temporal lobe.
The research suggests that, compared to a person who sits for 10 hours a day, someone of the same age who typically sits for 15 hours would have a medial temporal lobe that’s 10 per cent thinner.
And that, said study leader Prabha Siddarth, represents a lot of missing brain.
Neuroscientists frequently measure the brain’s volume. But examining variations in the thickness of a particular structure is a more revealing way to look at differences among individuals, said Siddarth, a biostatistician and quantum chemist at UCLA.
Imagine you are removing the cortex of the brain, smoothing out its many folds (or sulci) and laying it flat to measure its depth (which, in the medial temporal lobe, typically ranges from two to three millimetres). Now, take that flattened brain tissue, fold it up and pop it into place. That will help you appreciate that a 10-per-cent increase in thickness will translate into a structure that’s more densely packed with brain cells and the connections that lash them together.
The study did not find any correlation between subjects’ exercise habits and the thickness of either their medial temporal lobe or its constituent structures. That surprised the researchers, since other work has found brain volume is generally greater — and cognitive performance is better — in people who work out more.
Siddarth cautioned that this negative finding should not be reassuring to couch potatoes. It suggests that for inveterate sitters, even regular bouts of intensive exercise will not undo the damage.
For those looking to keep their brains plump and their memories sharp, Siddarth said the message is clear: Get up. Pace while talking on the phone, dance, take a walk at lunch. And if you’re at a computer all day, set hourly alarms that remind you to stand and march around.