Toronto Star

END OF THE TAURUS

Game-changing sedan was abandoned in favour of SUVs and crossovers The company’s European-style sedan stood apart from the boxy, American cars of its day.

- CHRIS WOODYARD USA TODAY

How Ford’s sedan grabbed the car industry by the horns,

At a time when companies loathed taking risks, Ford couldn’t have made a bolder move than to create the Taurus, a sleek, European-style sedan that stood apart from the boxy, clunky American cars of its day.

Ford’s bet-the-company move in 1985 was emulated again more than two decades later when another risk-taking and revered executive, CEO Alan Mulally, revived the Taurus nameplate that the company had abandoned.

Now Taurus is going away again, most likely forever. Ford announced that as part of its move to beef up its truck and SUV lineup, it’s going to kill the Taurus along with the Fiesta, Fusion and its small van, the C-Max. Focus will be recreated as a more robust hatchback, the Focus Active. The only car in the existing lineup that will remain is the iconic Mustang.

These days, the Taurus is a vestige of the past. While fullsize cars ruled U.S. highways through the 1970s, the gas-price shocks that followed made mid-size models such as the Fusion the most popular. Now, even they are overshadow­ed by small crossovers.

Taurus is seen mostly on highways in its police version, but even that market has turned to SUVs.

Yet Taurus’ place in automotive history is secure. In the mid-1980s, Ford wanted a game changer. Sedan design had grown stale. Taurus would be completely different — a car that people would proudly want to park in their driveways to show off to neighbours.

“Taurus will live on in history as one of Ford’s brightest ideas,” said Leslie Kendall, curator of the Petersen Automotive Museum in Los Angeles. “A lot of other manufactur­ers looked at the Taurus and said, ‘We had better catch up.’”

John Clinard, a semi-retired public relations executive for Ford, recalled the nervous moments when the Taurus was first introduced. “It was a big gamble,” he said. With its lack of a convention­al grille and rounded, instead of squared-off, shape, consumers brought together to critique fu- ture designs in focus groups hated it. Ford, showing a courage that few companies nowadays would muster, moved forward with a conviction that it had a potential hit on its hands.

“It was a car that did not research well, but people knew in their gut this would work,” Clinard said.

They were right. Sales roared for the Taurus and its Mercury sibling, the Sable. The station wagon version was as shapely as the sedan. Enthusiast­s embraced a performanc­e version, the SHO (super high output).

Ford says because Taurus and the other car models are going away, drivers should look to the future. It hopes people will come to see its reinvigora­ted lineup of SUVs and crossovers as the cars of tomorrow — sleek, practical and fuel-efficient.

“I think the Taurus was a fantastic vehicle for Ford, and I think our new lineup is even cooler,” said Jim Farley, president of Ford’s global division and himself a fan of the SHO version of Taurus.

Still, that’s not much comfort to enthusiast­s like Ron Porter in Lake Orion, Mich., owner of a 1989 Taurus SHO in “currant red.”

He bought it in 2008, he said. “People still like it.”

The SHO version was a car that people could drive to work during the week and race on weekends. “A convertibl­e or two-door just doesn’t cut it,” he said.

Porter, member of the national SHO Club, which brings Taurus fans together in droves to kick tires, said it will hurt to see it go. When Taurus SHO came out, the idea of a modern Ford-built, high-performanc­e sedan “was pretty radical,” he said. Now, “Ford people are left without that kind of option.”

“I think the Taurus was a fantastic vehicle for Ford, and I think our new lineup is even cooler.” JIM FARLEY PRESIDENT, FORD’S GLOBAL DIVISION

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada