Toronto Star

Raw milk backers won’t be cowed

Congressma­n’s push for easier access is defeated 79-331 in House vote

- LESLEY CLARK

WASHINGTON— Enough of this “pasteuriza­tion without representa­tion,” protested Rep. Thomas Massie. The Kentucky Republican wants to make it easier for small-scale farmers to sell raw milk and his outrage spilled onto the House floor.

Massie, who has also tried to make it easier for small-scale farmers to sell beef, pork and lamb, got a chance May 18 to change federal law he considers too oppressive when it comes to what Americans eat and drink. His bid failed, 79 to 331. Massie conceded he knew “big milk” was opposed. The “lactose lobby,” he charged, is “very intolerant of freedom.”

The dairy industry hailed the plan’s defeat, saying it would have led to an increased risk in food-borne illnesses. The federal government considers raw milk a threat to public health, and only gives approval to the processed variety.

The National Milk Producers Federation and the Internatio­nal Dairy Foods Associatio­n in a letter to House Speaker Paul Ryan and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi had bashed Massie’s provision as “an unnecessar­y risk to consumer safety and public health.”

The U.S. Food and Drug Administra­tion (FDA) has mandated pasteuriza­tion of all milk products since 1987 and prevents the sale or transport of unpasteuri­zed milk between states.

Due to its increasing popularity, however, more than two dozen states now allow the sale of raw, or unpasteuri­zed, milk. Massie’s plan would have allowed the trade of unpasteuri­zed milk or milk products be- tween states where distributi­on is already legal.

He suggested that would prevent situations such as the armed 2010 raid of a Pennsylvan­ia farm by FDA agents looking for raw milk products.

“What crime could they possibly be going after?” Massie asked. “Is it a human traffickin­g ring? Is it a drug bust? No, they’re after an Amish farmer for selling milk straight from the cow.”

Fellow lawmakers were not convinced there are any benefits to bypassing pasteuriza­tion, a heat-treatment process that kills microbes.

Indeed, Rep. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas), who cited warnings from the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention against drinking raw milk, likened it to “drinking water out of a cow hoof print in the dirt.”

Rep. Ted Yoho (R-Florida), a veterinari­an, said raw milk can carry a host of nasty germs, including Campylobac­ter, E. coli and listeria, and cause a variety of life-threatenin­g maladies including tuberculos­is, cow pox, diphtheria and typhoid fever.

“I’m not against raw milk, but if it’s your cow, you ought to drink it at your house,” Yoho said.

Rep. Kurt Schrader (D-Oregon), crossed the aisle to side with his fellow veterinari­an: “Milk, which is high in protein, starch and fat is an ideal medium for bacterial growth,” he argued.

Massie did get backing from a dairy state lawmaker, Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-Wisconsin), who said there were a number of raw milk enthusiast­s in his district.

“Chiropract­ors, nurses, veterinari­ans are the ones who feel strongly about drinking raw milk,” Grothman said.

He was surprised to hear a complaint from a visiting European diplomat who told him that the worst thing about the United States was the scarcity of raw milk and cheese.

“I thought it was a shame that America, the land of the free, we don’t have those freedoms,” Grothman said. Though his amendment was soundly defeated, Massie savoured a drop of victory, saying he believed it was the first time a debate on raw milk had caused a splash on the House floor.

“Win or lose, I’m happy to have Congress weigh in on this,” Massie said.

 ?? DREAMSTIME ?? Kentucky lawmaker Thomas Massie wants to boost the ability for small-scale farmers to sell raw milk across state lines.
DREAMSTIME Kentucky lawmaker Thomas Massie wants to boost the ability for small-scale farmers to sell raw milk across state lines.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada