The FAQ on Ottawa’s Trans Mountain deal
OTTAWA— The federal government launched a rescue plan for the stalled Trans Mountain pipeline expansion, pledging $4.5 billion as a downpayment on its political vow to move more Alberta oil to markets. The Star answers key questions about the move: How much will it actually cost beyond the initial $4.5 billion?
A lot. The $4.5 billion committed by the federal government simply buys the Trans Mountain pipeline and assets associated with the work done so far on the expansion. Some $1 billion has already been spent on work to twin the pipeline and analysts say it could take another $6 billion to $7 billion to finish.
But there are other potential costs, even if Ottawa succeeds in finding another company to take on the project. The Trudeau government will extend indemnity or insurance to cover any “extraordinary” politicallymotivated delays caused by any province or municipality, and will even promise to buy back the project if it confronts losses in the courts or cannot complete the project despite “commercially reasonable efforts.”
Some critics argue that, in addition to actual project costs, the price tag should include the $1.5 billion over five years that Ottawa committed to a new Oceans Protection Plan, which beefs up coastal safeguards for Arctic and Atlantic waters as well as Pacific ones. It was a key demand by the former B.C. provincial Liberal government as a condition of its agreement to the project. In the event that the government does not find a buyer and gets stuck with the pipeline, is it a good investment?
Federal officials hope to find another private sector company quickly, one with a greater appetite for risk than Kinder Morgan, to take on the project. If that fails, Canadian taxpayers will be the proud owners of a pipeline. Walid Hejazi, an associate professor at the Rotman School of Management, said that pipelines typically have “enormous returns.” The Trans Mountain pipeline now has a “revenue requirement” of $287 million in 2017, the amount needed to cover its operating costs and produce a 9.5-percent return on equity, according to the National Energy Board. But governments have many priorities, and they all cost money, so tying up $4.5 billion may not be the best use of government money long-term. How many jobs for Canadians will be created?
The Canadian government says the project would create 15,000 new jobs during construction, and 440 permanent jobs a year during operation. And, Ottawa says, the pipeline expansion provides support to “thousands of jobs” in Canada’s crude oil production sector and supply chain.
The company struck about $300 million in mutual benefits agreements with about 43 Indigenous groups. But a 2015 study done for Metro Vancouver and B.C. said the prospects were overstated, and the pipeline would produce only around 4,000 new positions in the province. What are the environmental risks?
This question lies at the heart of B.C.’s opposition to the project. The expansion would increase the capacity of the pipeline to 890,000 barrels per day, up from 300,000 barrels. There is the risk of a spill along the pipeline route. There is also the risk of a tanker spill, once the oil has been delivered to port. B.C., in particular, is concerned about the possibility of a spill in coastal waters. As noted, the federal government tried to mitigate those concerns with its “oceans protection plan” meant to improve marine safety and respond to spills, but B.C. says that strategy doesn’t go far enough. Canadian taxpayers would be on the hook to pay for the clean-ups of any spill. What are the implications for current or anticipated legal actions?
Uncertain at this time. Ottawa has always insisted that, because the pipeline crosses provincial boundaries, the project falls squarely into federal jurisdiction. B.C. is challenging that claim and has gone to court seeking clarification over the province’s powers to control “substances … that could potentially cause devastating environment and economic harms if they are spilled.” Government officials say it is much harder for the B.C. government to make laws against a federal Crown-owned project. Who wins? Who loses?
Alberta Premier Rachel Notley comes out a winner. She’s been an advocate of the pipeline and the expansion will move more oil and ultimately boost her province’s economy. B.C. Premier John Horgan may also be on the winning side. Horgan, leader of a minority government, may ultimately fail in his attempts to block the pipeline expansion, but B.C. voters may still reward his determination. It’s too soon to say how Prime Minister Justin Trudeau may fare. Trudeau has tied his government’s fortunes to the pipeline getting built. But the decision to take ownership of the project now puts the Liberals squarely on a collision course with their opponents and that could cost them in B.C. in 2019.