STUDENT VS. SECULARISTS
French critics can’t wrap their heads around a student leader’s scarf.
PARIS— The French interior minister, Gérard Collomb, called her appearance “shocking.” Marlène Schiappa, the minister of gender equality, said she exhibited a “manifestation of political Islam.” The satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo put her on its cover with a drawing that many considered racist.
Her offence: wearing a head scarf during a television interview.
Elected last December as the leader of the Sorbonne chapter of the French National Students’ Union, Maryam Pougetoux, 19, is used to hearing from those who disagree with her progressive views. But she was entirely unprepared for what happened last month after she criticized changes in educational policy in the interview.
Pougetoux, a practising Muslim who wears a head scarf that covers her hair and neck, had been asked to comment on one of the main television channels, M6, about proposed changes that would make admission to universities more selective. She and the hordes of students who took to the streets recently in protest consider the measure discriminatory and elitist.
But the debate that followed had nothing to do with education and everything to do with her appearance. It was set off in large part by Laurent Bouvet, a secularist and member of a group called Le Printemps Républicain, or Republican Spring. The group was created in 2016 to defend the French republican ideal of “laïcité,” which emerged during the revolution as a way to keep the Roman Catholic Church out of the affairs of state. But in recent years, critics say, some groups have used it to suppress Islam in France.
In a Twitter post, Bouvet said “we aren’t hunting anyone but merely pointing to the inconsistency” of a student leader wearing a headscarf. “How can one defend values like abortion and feminist principles while displaying conspicuously their religious beliefs,” he asked.
Pretty soon, it seemed that almost everyone had something to say about this unapologetically religious student.
Pougetoux herself was baffled by the outburst, saying she had to research “political Islam” online to understand the accusation. She also was not particularly outraged by the caricature of her on the profanity- laced cover of Charlie Hebdo, which many said made her look like a monkey.
“Charlie Hebdo mocks everyone,” she said. What she liked, she says, is that “they were the only ones who actually emphasized my message.”
Still, she realized not everyone shared her sense of humour. “I was extremely hurt when I realized that it caused a lot of pain for my family and friends,” she said.
She has received plenty of support from her peers.
“In five years I have never seen this level of mistreatment of a student leader,” one student from Denmark said to Pougetoux in the offices of the student group. “You are super-amazing. Don’t let the racists win.”
Asparkle came to Pougetoux’s blue eyes as she thanked the young man. She has been receiving similar demonstrations of support over the past two weeks on her university’s campus, on the streets of the French capital and online.
But it’s been quite an ordeal for the 19-year-old, who is studying literature and communications.
Pougetoux did not break any law. While headscarves and other religious symbols are banned in public service and in primary and secondary public schools in France, they are permitted on college campuses. Moreover, one expert said, the concept of laïcité should not be used to stigmatize minorities but instead to ensure freedom for everyone.
“It is the state that has an obligation to be neutral, not the citizens,” said Nicolas Cadène, a senior member of the Observatory of Secularism, an agency that advocates respect of laïcité and advises the government.
“People who use the laïcité to extend the neutrality are wrong. It is out of the question to challenge anyone’s freedom.”
Still, many French Muslims felt directly targeted by the 2004 law that banned headscarves and religious symbols for girls. Remarks by French political leaders have occasionally fanned the flames, like when President Emmanuel Macron said that the head scarf was not “in conformity with civility.”
Pougetoux, who started wearing a head scarf in middle school, says she had no problem removing it when she entered her school building.
“It was the law, so I respected it,” she said. “I thought that it was a sacrifice that anyway I wouldn’t have to endure in college.”
Pougetoux makes an odd target for the guardians of French identity, Islamophobes and racists, in that she is thoroughly French and religiously tolerant. Her family’s roots are in the Corrèze region of southwestern France, and she grew up in a working-class household in the outskirts of Paris.
She comes from a long tradition of political involvement, particularly in trade union protests over workers’ rights. Her great-grandparents were part of the French resistance during the Second World War, and her great-grandmother demon- strated for women’s suffrage, which was granted only in 1944.
Pougetoux’s parents both converted to Islam before they met, and she says she was raised in a tolerant environment accepting of differences.
While Pougetoux may not realize how much hate she has ignited, observers see the uproar as leading to another in a series of debates over French identity, especially the sexism many say is latent.
“For some, for a woman to be emancipated, she must fit into a certain stereotype,” said Nadia Marzouki, a political scientist and research fellow at the National Center of Scientific Research in Paris. “Some can’t stand that a Muslim woman can be outspoken.” Bouvet, in response to emailed questions, said his outburst against Pougetoux “is absolutely not a question of secularism, in the sense of the law. Maryam Pougetoux does not break the law and does not go against laïcité. The problem is her role as the official representative of a student union that until now defended ideas and values incompatible with those that are represented by the Islamic veil worn by a woman.”
But Pougetoux, who hopes to work for international nonprofit groups, said she believed that many politicians and intellectuals in France were set in archaic ways of thinking that do not reflect the more tolerant viewpoints of French citizens or, especially, her college peers.
“People think that we can never wear a head scarf by choice,” she said. “I wore it by religious conviction. It does not prevent me from having a normal life, and from having progressive values and dedicating my life to my political engagement.”
“For some, for a woman to be emancipated, she must fit into a certain stereotype.” NADIA MARZOUKI NATIONAL CENTER OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH