House rejects hard-right immigration bill
Issue intensified by heartbreaking images of separated children
WASHINGTON— The House killed a hard-right immigration bill Thursday and Republican leaders delayed a planned vote on a compromise GOP package with the party’s lawmakers fiercely divided over an issue that has long confounded them.
The conservative measure was defeated 231-193, with 41 Republicans — mostly moderates — joining Democrats in voting against it. Those defections — nearly 1 in 5 GOP lawmakers — underscored the party’s chasm over immigration and the election-year pressures Republicans face to stay true to districts that range from staunchly conservative to proimmigrant.
Republican leaders are delaying a vote on the compromise legislation until next week and planning changes in hopes of salvaging the legislation.
GOP lawmakers leaving a twohour closed-door meeting say leaders will add two provisions to the sweeping legislation to attract more backing.
One would require employers to use an online system to verify the citizenship of their employees, which could attract conservatives. The other would make it easier for employers to retain migrant workers, which could bolster support from Republicans from agricultural regions.
The overall bill would make it possible for young immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally to become citizens, finance U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed border wall and impose other security requirements.
As if the internal GOP turmoil was not enough, the party’s political exposure on the issue has been intensified by heartbreaking images of migrant children separated from families and complicated by opaque statements by Trump.
At the White House, Trump defended his administration’s “zero tolerance” policy of prosecuting all migrants caught ille- gally entering the country, a change that has caused thousands of families to be divided while the parents are detained. He said without it, “you would have a run on this country the likes of which nobody has ever seen.” He said he was inviting Congress’s top two Democrats, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, to the White House for immigration bargaining. He called them “extremist open-border Democrats.”
And in a tweet that seemed to undermine House leaders’ efforts to round up votes, he questioned the purpose of their legislation by suggesting it was doomed in the Senate anyway.
Trump issued an executive order Wednesday aimed at reversing his own policy of taking immigrant children from their detained parents, but emotions remained high.
OTTAWA– Many of the so-called DREAMers, some 700,000 young immigrants facing potential expulsion under U.S. President Donald Trump, would qualify to immigrate to Canada, according to a briefing note obtained by the Star.
The note, prepared for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, suggests that “many” of the DREAMers would be able to find a home in Canada under federal and provincial immigration programs.
The cohort of young immigrants was protected under the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which the Trump administration announced it will phase out.
They now remain in legal limbo, as court challenges against their deportation proceed and the U.S. Congress remains unable to craft a legislative solution.
“While some DACA recipients may attempt to enter Canada as asylum seekers, many could qualify under the various immigration program streams,” reads the briefing note, prepared September 2017.
“DACA recipients who have attained advanced education and are employed in in-demand occupations may apply for permanent residency through express entry,” the note continued.
“While Canada’s long-standing immigration priority has been for high-skilled workers, there are limited pathways to permanent residency for lower-skilled workers (such as the provincial nominee program).”
Any advice Trudeau received about the situation has been completely censored from the documents. The immigration issue has once again gripped the United States, with the Trump administration facing widespread outrage over a policy of separating children from parents as they attempt to illegally enter the United States. On Wednesday, Trump reversed the policy. But it’s unclear how — or if — the more than 2,300 children currently held in U.S. detention centres will be reunited with their parents. The DREAMers — named for the failed Obama-era Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act — represent an older cohort who came to the U.S. as undocumented children. DREAMers were between the ages of 15 and 36 as of September 2017, when U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the administration would phase out the program. While the DREAMers were facing a deadline of March 2018, a San Francisco court granted a nationwide injunction while their fate is decided by the courts.
Trudeau’s briefing note pointed to “various U.S. studies (that) have shown that DACA has had a positive impact on educational attainment and employment.”
Roughly 60 per cent of DACA recipients own their own home, have a higher rate of enrollment in higher education than other U.S. workers of the same age, and 16 per cent have either completed some college or have a bachelor’s degree. But the majority of DACA recipients are employed in low-skill occupations, putting them at a disadvantage in Canada’s federal economic immigration streams. The Star asked Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Minister Ahmed Hussen’s if Canada had the capacity to accept DREAMers facing deportation.
In a statement, a spokesperson for Hussen’s office said the government remains committed to a “thoughtful and responsible approach to immigration.”
“We won’t speculate on any possible future trends, but we continuously monitor conditions and developments in other countries to inform our planning,” wrote Mathieu Genest in an email.
Conservative immigration critic Michelle Rempel said the Canadian government can’t look at one particular cohort or group, but needs to take a holistic approach to the immigration system.
“You can’t look at this issue in isolation, right? There’s a huge demand for entry into Canada, and certainly many experts talk about immigration to bolster the Canadian economy over time as well as the expectation and the duty that Canada has to be an active participant in humanitarian immigration,” Rempel told the Star .
“The broader question is how do we do that? That’s why you can’t look at the demands of one particular cohort without placing it into the context of looking at what are Canada’s larger objectives when it comes to immigration.”