Toronto Star

Why prefab houses are a trend that didn’t stick

‘Holy grail of design’ has its share of setbacks, despite popularity abroad

- MICHELE LERNER

Design magazines love them.

So do movie stars, environmen­talists and some forwardthi­nking builders who tout them as the way every home should be built in the future, says Greenwich, Conn.-based Sheri Koones, author of Prefabulou­s + Almost Off the Grid.

Yet, despite having been around for decades, prefab or modular homes made up just 2 per cent of new single-family houses in 2016, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Prefab constructi­on gained traction in the 1970s when builders and architects recognized they could save on time and costs by moving the majority of the process into a factory. “The real saving is in time,” says Brian Abramson of Method Homes, a prefab factory in Seattle that works mostly on modern, custom homes. “It typically takes 50 per cent less construc- tion time to complete a prefab house.”

“You can do any style you want, from traditiona­l to craftsman to colonial to Tudor or contempora­ry,” says Mark Giarraputo, an architect with Studio Z Design Concepts in Bethesda, Md. “Prefab lends itself a little more to contempora­ry homes because of the clean lines, but you’re not limited to that style.”

A significan­t turning point for prefab homes came in 20022003, when Dwell magazine held a competitio­n for architects to design a $200,000 (U.S.) prefab house, says Ryan Smith, director of the Integrated Technology in Architectu­re Collaborat­ive at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City.

“Prefab constructi­on became the holy grail of design,” says Joseph Tanney, co-founder of Resolution: 4 Architectu­re in New York City, winner of the 2002 Dwell magazine competitio­n. “The idea was that it would be the answer for modern, affordable, mass-produced housing. We’ve seen far fewer prefab factories than what we expected.”

Smith says that prefab housing is more common in other countries, particular­ly Sweden, Japan and Germany. “The difference is that they tend to be production-based, so the homes all look alike, even if they are high-end homes.”

Prefab, though, also has its hassles. Robert Gurney, an architect in Washington, D.C., says he will never design another prefab house after the one he built in Bethesda. “I can design a stick-built house that’s faster and less costly to build,” he says.

The biggest obstacle, says Gurney, was that it took six months longer than normal to get the permits. However, he believes the control offered by a factory can produce quality constructi­on and insulation.

Brendan O’Neill Jr., president of O’Neill Developmen­t in Gaithersbu­rg, Md., has lived for 19 years in a modular home he built with his father. The house took four months to complete from plans to occupancy, while a stick-built house typically takes six to 10 months.

“My house has been through an earthquake, a derecho, a few blizzards and some wild windstorms without damage, so I know it’s solidly built,” he says.

 ?? MAXWELL MACKENZIE/BM MODULAR ONE ?? Architect Robert Gurney's BM Modular One house, in Bethesda, Md., is made of 13 parts that were built in a factory.
MAXWELL MACKENZIE/BM MODULAR ONE Architect Robert Gurney's BM Modular One house, in Bethesda, Md., is made of 13 parts that were built in a factory.
 ?? LISA PETROLE ?? A Method Homes-designed house near Lake Tahoe, Calif.
LISA PETROLE A Method Homes-designed house near Lake Tahoe, Calif.
 ?? STU ESTLER ?? A Studio Z-designed house in Bethesda, Md.
STU ESTLER A Studio Z-designed house in Bethesda, Md.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada