Toronto Star

Old millennial­s vs. new millennial­s

- Twitter: @KateCarraw­ay

Late last month, 28-year-old Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez won the Democratic primary in New York state’s 14th U.S. Congressio­nal District, beating incumbent and Dem insider Joseph Crowley in a bombshell win.

The media theatre that followed inevitably took up Ocasio-Cortez’s age (also a side door into commentary about how she used to be a bartender, and is cute). “A millennial!” the coverage trilled, baffled or impressed that someone from the Avocado Toast Generation pulled it off, as if Ocasio-Cortez and her cohort were still, essentiall­y, kids.

“Millennial­s,” as an idea and socioecono­mic concern, has become shorthand for categorizi­ng everything strange and unknowable about people under age 40, a generation denying the obligation­s and opportunit­ies of car and home ownership, steady employment and stability, who sleep with their phones, and maybe receive new forms of language and sex and work and power in their sleep. But millennial­s are grown now, players, a constituen­cy being absorbed into, and changing, the firmament.

A confusion within the confusion is a distinctio­n that is known only or mostly to millennial­s themselves: the generation is better and more usefully understood (insofar as any generation can be considered in any way cohesive, beyond the social, political and cultural gales that met them) as two uneven halves of a whole, with Early or Old millennial­s, born in the early to mid-1980s, many of them more aligned with Generation X before them, and New, or Young, or Late millennial­s, born after that and for the next 15 years-ish, before Generation Z, who arrived around 2000.

What is delineated between the Old and the New is what happened in the respective youths of each group: Old Mills, such as I, experience­d crushes and best friends and homework and adolescenc­e free of the overwhelmi­ng influence of the internet, and Young Mills did not. That’s not a distinctio­n only of nostalgic value — it colours everything that comes after.

This is, to me, luck, subjective­ly the wild, grassy fortune of my life.

Young Mills have their own luck, are digital geniuses, seem even further removed from the stigmas and dogmas of previous generation­s — see, for instance, Ocasio-Cortez — which maybe confirms the Early and Late distinctio­n. I had a cellphone and email address and sense of “online” and its possibilit­ies in high school, but not before, so I was still pushed outside to play (mostly, I read), but then later, transition­ed easily to an al- ways-on, always-online paradigm that was largely created by my own cohort (Mark Zuckerberg is, of course, a millennial), my 10,000 hours of practice, the not entirely accurate shorthand attributed to Malcolm Gladwell about what it takes to become expert in something, achieved through sleepovers spent messing around on IM and IRC and ICQ, weekends dropping in on LAN parties (and then leaving to do something cool), and the kind of texting that, and this was obvious to us even then in our Motorola Razr fever dreams, was so slow and painful as to be nearly useless.

Sort-of-Young Mills arrived as teenagers with broadband internet; Young-Young-Mills always had it, and with it, the ubiquity of porn and a whole new schema of sociosexua­l values, and online bullying, and the idea that spending hours a day looking at screens was, you know, fine.

What is lost and what is gained by any innovation, from radio to Tinder, is a boring debate for the ages, much like which generation is “better,” as if that could ever . . . be, but it’s meaningful to me, having been there and then here, that the phone — the landline — was the last element of Old Mill social life that refused its user a totally online projection of themselves.

A landline mediated between a real-life and other self, only degrees away from how presmart cellphones did, but calling someone meant possibly talking to their parents, and following a script created by the social contract that seems to have been voided, even in business.

(I’ve worked with Young Mill and Gen Z journalism interns who are too uncomforta­ble to cold-call sources, or too comfortabl­e in their own awkwardnes­s to do it well, effectivel­y bouncing themselves from a career, and maybe others, that involves some old-school social savvy.)

Land lines were bounded by time, too, which meant that after-hours contact had to be IRL.

That I was pinged via my bedroom window being hit by stones and dirt clumps liberated from my parents’ landscapin­g, instead of “U up?” texts is, to me, the distillati­on of Old Mill luck: there was a time, however brief, where Old Mills were conscious of what we were about to lose.

 ?? DAMON WINTER/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Media coverage after Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, 28, won a Democratic primary for a New York Congressio­nal district revealed a lot of misconcept­ions about millennial­s, Kate Carraway writes.
DAMON WINTER/THE NEW YORK TIMES Media coverage after Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, 28, won a Democratic primary for a New York Congressio­nal district revealed a lot of misconcept­ions about millennial­s, Kate Carraway writes.
 ??  ?? Kate Carraway OPINION
Kate Carraway OPINION

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada