Toronto Star

Your environmen­tal rights (not) at work in Ontario

- MELISSA FELDER Melissa Felder has provided environmen­tal advisory services for public and private sector clients across Canada since 2001.

The last month has seen an extraordin­ary dismantlin­g of Ontario’s environmen­tal initiative­s. This includes the cancellati­on of the cap and trade framework, which is the centrepiec­e of the provincial Climate Change Action Plan.

Dismantlin­g cap and trade — which was not a carbon tax but the market mechanism in place to cap the amount of emissions industry could emit and disburse proceeds to initiative­s that could further reduce pollution — has significan­t economic and social repercussi­ons for Ontarians. This includes, but is not limited to, the likely formidable legal cost to dismantle these agreements in court. There is also the cancellati­on of funds earmarked for school and social housing retrofits, municipal bicycle and waste reduction infrastruc­ture projects and many others employing individual­s across the province.

This is on top of separately cancelling 758 renewable energy projects, including projects planned by homeowners, schools and small business. Also worthy of your attention is how the government went about repealing cap and trade. Under the Environmen­tal Bill of Rights (EBR), the Ontario Ministry of Environmen­t is required to post notice of environmen­tally significan­t proposals on the Environmen­tal Registry. Proposals are to be posted on the Registry for a period of 30 days. The point of the EBR, and this process, is to ensure detailed, specific consultati­on with all of the people of Ontario on each environmen­tally significan­t government decision.

When the ministry cancelled cap and trade, it did so without first posting a regulatory proposal for public consultati­on to the Environmen­tal Registry for a 30-day period. This means this major and environmen­tally significan­t change to existing policy was done without allowing any Ontario citizen the opportunit­y to comment, which is the point of the registry.

What the ministry did instead is post an exception notice comprised of a pithy few sentences buried in an older version of the registry. To defend its use of an exception notice, the ministry cited that “the recent Ontario election was a process of public participat­ion that was substantia­lly equivalent to the process required under the EBR.”

This is an extraordin­ary declaratio­n. Our Ministry of Environmen­t has indicated that a provincial election is the same thing as giving every Ontario citizen the opportunit­y to comment on an environmen­tally significan­t decision that may affect them. Apparently the last provincial election is proxy for forfeiting our specific right to participat­e in the EBR process, which was establishe­d 25 years ago to allow better public participat­ion and greater accountabi­lity of government in environmen­tal matters.

What is next? More exception notices dismantlin­g all environmen­tal regulation built in Ontario since the start of EBR in 1993? Perhaps this a fitting outcome given we elected a party that publicly campaigned on getting rid of the carbon tax, a tax that we did not even have in the first place.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada