Doubts grow over Musk’s plan to take Tesla private
Valuation of $420 a share questioned
As Tesla’s board of directors rallied Wednesday behind chief Elon Musk’s extraordinary push to take the all-electric automaker private, a growing contingent of investors, analysts and former regulators voiced their doubts that the deal would ever take off.
Tesla’s nine-member board, which includes Musk’s younger brother Kimbal, issued a belated statement Wednesday morning saying Musk had “opened a discussion” last week with the board about the benefits of taking Tesla private. The board, it said, had met “several times” over the last week and was actively working to “evaluate” the proposal.
But the board offered no further details of the proposal or its funding, sparking questions about the feasibility of the master gambit Musk revealed in a surprise series of tweets on Tuesday. “This is out there, even for Tesla,” analysts with Barclays wrote Wednesday.
In a note to clients, Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas said Musk’s strategy to reveal the offer on Twitter might end up costing him in higher costs and financial risk. “Why announce it to the world in this way ... which could significantly contribute to the required premium and leverage?” Jonas said.
Investors also seemed to be hesitant of the deal. Shares rocketed up 11 per cent after Musk’s grand reveal Tuesday, with some expecting they would hit $420 — the price Musk had promised shareholders would receive once the company had finalized its go-private transformation.
But after markets opened Wednesday morning, Tesla’s stock edged downward about 1 per cent, to $375.
Cowen analyst Jeffrey Osborne told clients in a note Wednesday that he didn’t believe Tesla’s current business supports “a valuation anywhere close to $420 per share.”
Musk has downplayed the power of the tweets he launches at all hours to his 22 million Twitter followers: “My tweets are literally what I’m thinking at the moment, not carefully crafted corporate bs, which is really just banal propaganda,” he said in June.
But his nine-word tweet during the middle of trading Tuesday — “Am considering taking Tesla private at $420. Funding secured.” — created what some lawyers are calling a potential battleground for lawsuits, regulator investigations and shareholder action.
Harvey Pitt, a former chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, said Musk’s asserting a final sale price and that funding was “secured” opened him to potential charges of stock manipulation or securities fraud.
“He has done enough things that might warrant somebody taking a close look,” Pitt said.
Neither Musk nor the board have said where the “secured” funding would come from.
Tesla is a legendary cash-burner, with roughly $10 billion in debts and $2 billion in reserves, and Musk would probably need in the tens of billions of dollars to buy out shareholders at the right price.
The oil-rich kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s investment fund has gobbled up a multibillion-dollar stake in the company in recent months, the Financial Times reported Tuesday, but Tesla has not an- swered questions about the involvement of the kingdom, or anyone else, in how he would finance the company’s exit from public markets.
The company declined to comment beyond pointing to an all-employee email sent Tuesday by Musk.
It’s also unclear how Musk came up with the $420 price.
Company share prices, particularly in deals as giant as this one, are almost always decided by corporate executives, board members or consultants who review market data and optimize for maximum value.
“Just because” Musk wants it at $420 “doesn’t mean that there aren’t other people who might be willing to come in with another transaction that would be more beneficial to shareholders,” Pitt said.
“This is very haphazard and raises, in my view, serious questions about why he would choose to do things in exactly this way.”
Lawyers said every word of Musk’s tweets will be examined, including why he used words such as “considering,” to determine whether he might have tried to inflate the stock price to blow out short-selling investors, a longtime foe. The SEC declined to comment. Investors have also questioned why the manoeuvre was not listed in a 69-page SEC filing, submitted last week and released Monday, that provided intricate detail of Tesla’s financial outlook and coming events.
Teresa Goody, a former SEC official, said Musk “did something inappropriate and caused chaos in the market” in a way that would likely draw scrutiny from investigators.
“Your disclosures should create certainty in the market so that everyone has a fair and complete understanding of what is going on,” she said.