Toronto Star

A closer look at Latinas on TV

From Modern Family to Superstore to Charmed: still a small percentage

- NINA METZ CHICAGO TRIBUNE

Modern Family is one of the longest-running sitcoms currently on TV, now in its 10th season on ABC. The show has made Sofia Vergara a star — so much so that she is the highest paid actress on TV, according to Forbes.

When looking at the landscape of Latina representa­tion, Vergara’s success stands out. But so do the stereotype­s her character embodies. In her book Latinas & Latinos on TV, Isabel Molina-Guzman analyzes recent comedies, assessing the good and the bad.

Even as we inch closer to 500 scripted TV shows available per year on various platforms, only a small percentage centre on Latino characters.

“Part of the reason I wrote the book is I was kind of frustrated with all of the publicity coming out of the showbiz trades about how diverse Hollywood had gotten — and then you look at the actual shows and the people writing them and producing them, they’re not diverse.”

I spoke with Molina-Guzman, who is a professor of media and cinema studies as well as Latina/Latino studies at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, about some shows on TV this season. The following is an edited transcript.

In your book, you talk about how Sofia Vergara is this really notable pinnacle of achievemen­t because she’s one of the most recognizab­le actors on TV as well as the highest paid. On the other hand, as Gloria, she’s playing this sexualized Latina stereotype.

Personally, I love her. I think she’s a brilliant comedian and a very smart comedian. And until very recently she was the only Latina character on television in such a prominent role on a successful show. She’s playing a stereotypi­cal character, but Gloria has also been allowed to be more nuanced in ways that are unexpected and really interestin­g. Her sexual politics on the show are much more progressiv­e than the more conservati­ve stereotype. For example, Latina women and mothers in particular are often portrayed as more Catholic and more socially rigid, whereas Gloria seems more socially conscious than a lot of the characters.

But we can’t forget her only way to access that visibility is through this decades-old stereotype that is super-familiar to most U.S. audiences. And that’s a problem. The scope of representa­tion is so narrow that for Sofia Vergara and this character, her path has to be through this spitfire Latina trope, which means: usually has an accent; usually very temperamen­tal; tends to look a particular way and have a particular body type.

You also talk about the idea of colour-blind casting in the book. Modern Family clearly does the opposite — Gloria’s ethnicity is part of who that character is. America Ferrera now stars on the NBC comedy Superstore, which I really love, and that show takes more of a colour-blind approach, where everyone is just this beleaguere­d big box store employee.

That’s one of my favourite shows. I think one of the things that has changed over the years is the rise of Shonda Rhimes and her success with colourblin­d casting, where ethnicity and race are not necessaril­y the motivating factor in storylines. And Superstore falls into that, but it’s also very smart about finding humour in the ethnic and racial difference­s of its characters.

Right, last season there was a storyline where a delivery guy started flirting with Ferrera’s character in Spanish, and that ended up playing on some of her insecuriti­es about her own Spanish fluency and not feeling Latina enough.

And one of the best episodes from the first season was the whole salsa wars episode (”Shots and Salsa”) where they want her to dress up in the sombrero and she refuses to do it because it’s stereotypi­cal and she feels like her manager is just asking her to do it because she’s Latina. So they’ve played with it. But it’s not the primary focus of the story, and I think that’s fine.

I just wish there was more diversity in the storylines writ large and that talented Latina and Latino actors got to play the same roles as white actors get to play, but maybe more embedded or informed by a particular set of experience­s. There should be a space for that. And for pushing back on stereotype­s and allowing us to see a broader spectrum of what it means to be not only Latina but African-American, Indigenous, Asian — that’s been the general problem, it’s always been so narrow and so few.

So colour-blind casting and colour-blind storytelli­ng can be great, but it does erase that specificit­y as well. One Day at a Time is a show that has been specific, but it’s only one of a few.

And it’s really had to fight for its existence at Netflix. That’s a show where Norman Lear used his capital in the industry to create a space for the showrunner (Gloria Calderon Kellett with Mike Royce) to tell that story the way that she wanted to do it. I wish more establishe­d showrunner­s did that for writers of colour.

Gloria Calderon Kellett told me that even visual cues were important to her. Like, she wanted cans of Bustelo coffee and Goya in that kitchen. Things that were recognizab­ly Latino that a Cuban-American family would have in their home.

And you get that when you have showrunner­s and writers who are able to speak to that experience. To have real change, you have to have those voices in the room. And there are multiple ways to tell any story. It’s not like all Latino writers are going to write a story the same way. The Charmed reboot got a lot of viewers excited because the network and producers led people to believe it was going to be an allLatina cast. It turns out that’s not the case. One of sisters is played by a Latina, Melonie Diaz. The other two actresses, Sarah Jeffery and Madeleine Mantock, are multiracia­l but not Latina. I don’t think the actresses should have to shoulder this debate, it’s more about how the producers and the CW weren’t forthright in the lead-up to the premiere.

It wasn’t just journalist­s who thought it was going to be a Latina-led show; fans thought so, too. That’s a perfect example of colour-blind casting, where they cast an actor but don’t really think about what that means for the character.

This is something I try to tackle in the book: That networks and showrunner­s are trying to tap into this sense of multicultu­ralism, but they do it in this ham-fisted way. That putting diversity on screen is enough, supposedly.

And that’s a way to do it (laughs) but for younger audiences, I don’t think that’s going to be enough. I saw this come up a lot on social media because people are legitimate­ly frustrated that we don’t really see Afro-Latina characters on TV. Meaning, characters who identify both as black and Latina.

Oh yeah, the way Charmed handled this is such a missed opportunit­y. In many ways, Afro-Latina actors in particular are completely constraine­d. They are mainly cast in African-American roles, like Gina Torres on Suits. Or playing aliens, like Zoe Saldana in Avatar. But very rarely are they considered for roles where they play Latinas.

So these actors are being written out of Latinidad because the media has a certain constructi­on of what Latinas look like. In other words, like Gloria on Modern Family: light skin, straight hair, blah, blah, blah. Afro-Latinas are very rarely able to push against the typecastin­g of what Latina actors are supposed to look like.

Judy Reyes, from Scrubs and Devious Maids and Claws, she’s said that most casting directors and writers, they want their Latinas to look Italian. They don’t want their Latinas to look like her.

Where’s the complexity? It’s a growing demographi­c, and they’re extremely under-represente­d. And that’s within the context of already low visibility for Latinos, so ... (laughs)

 ?? DAVID LIVINGSTON GETTY IMAGES ?? Sarah Jeffery, Melonie Diaz and Madeleine Mantock star in Charmed on the CW. Of the three actors, Diaz is the only Latina actor.
DAVID LIVINGSTON GETTY IMAGES Sarah Jeffery, Melonie Diaz and Madeleine Mantock star in Charmed on the CW. Of the three actors, Diaz is the only Latina actor.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada