Toronto Star

CAQ’s agenda could challenge federal parties

- Chantal Hébert Twitter: @ChantalHbe­rt

For the first time in 42 years, the curtain rose on the opening speech of a new party governing in Quebec’s national assembly on Wednesday. The circumstan­ces could not have been more different than in 1976.

Back then, the election of a Parti Québécois government had sent shock waves across the country.

It propelled the unity issue to the forefront of the Canadian political conversati­on. There it remained for almost half a century.

As recently as 2014, the possibilit­y of the election of a majority PQ government under Pauline Marois prompted then-prime minister Stephen Harper to uncharacte­ristically reach out to the premiers and to the main federal opposition leaders for advice as to how to thwart the scenario of another referendum.

By comparison, little drama attended the delivery by Premier François Legault of his Coalition Avenir Québec gov- ernment’s opening speech on Wednesday. The next Quebec/ Canada chapter is to be written by federalist­s at both the provincial and federal levels.

At its peak in the mid-1990s, the sovereignt­y movement boasted 131 MPs and MNAs. The PQ formed a majority government in Quebec and the Bloc Québécois made up the official opposition in Parliament. Today, there are 30 elected sovereignt­ists left on the scene, including the 10 in the House of Commons.

And while Legault is not a natural ally of Justin Trudeau’s Liberals, his relationsh­ip with the prime minister is — at least for now — less adversaria­l than that of Ontario Premier Doug Ford.

When it comes to federalpro­vincial relations, it is a bit as if Quebec had traded places with Ontario.

But the CAQ still stands to shape the next election’s conversati­on in ways that could be challengin­g for the main federalist parties — starting with Trudeau’s Liberals.

The immigratio­n issue dominated the recent Quebec campaign and many observers expect it to resurface in the lead-up to next fall’s federal vote.

They could be right but it is not yet a given. Since the provincial election, the two government­s have opened negotiatio­ns on Legault’s bid to reduce Quebec’s immigratio­n intake. He is set to bring it down from 52,000 to 40,000 next year. He would like part of the cut to come from the family reunificat­ion and refugee intakes that are under the sole control of the federal government.

Legault also wants to insert a French-language fluency test in the citizenshi­p process undergone by immigrants admitted under the Quebec/ Ottawa immigratio­n agreement. Depending on the outcome of the discussion­s between the two capitals, a frontal collision may yet be if not avoided entirely, at least delayed somewhat.

It may prove harder to put a lid on the even more contentiou­s debate over the balance between religious rights and the secular character of Quebec’s public institutio­ns.

Like the two government­s before his, Legault is committed to implementi­ng coercive measures as part of his party’s secularist agenda.

The CAQ plans to introduce legislatio­n early next year to impose a secular dress code on judges, Crown prosecutor­s, prison guards, police officers and teachers. The premier reiterated as much in Wednesday’s opening speech. “We will be very firm on that and we will act rapidly,” he declared.

This will be the third kick by a Quebec government at the same divisive can of worms. In both previous instances, the initiative resulted in fiery debates.

The PQ’s bid to enforce a secular dress code across the entire public sector died with the Marois government in 2014, but not before the policy created deep divisions within the sovereignt­y movement.

The courts have yet to deal with the Liberal veil ban adopted under former premier Philippe Couillard. Its applicatio­n was suspended pending a ruling on the substance of the law.

Legault’s upcoming bill will similarly face legal challenges. But he says he will override the Charter of Rights and Freedoms if need be to ensure it comes into force.

One way or another, the next instalment of the secularism debate is upon the province. As far as public opinion, it seems it is Legault’s to lose.

A CROP poll done for RadioCanad­a this month found solid support both for the CAQ’s immigratio­n cuts and the imposition of a secular dress code on public servants in so-called positions of authority — including school teachers. That support extends beyond the ranks of those who supported the CAQ in October, with at least two-thirds of poll respondent­s behind either measure.

Neither Trudeau’s Liberals nor his Conservati­ve and New Democrat rivals have much appetite for seeing the federal campaign become an extension of Quebec’s latest existentia­l debate.

But inasmuch as the Bloc Québécois and Maxime Bernier’s nascent People’s Party may be itching for a fight on what they believe could be fertile grounds in Quebec for their respective organizati­ons, the main parties may have little choice in the matter.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada