‘Enough about the wall already’
There is little enthusiasm for Trump’s border wall in village of Columbus
COLUMBUS, N.M.— Just minutes from the border in rural New Mexico, the Borderland Cafe in the village of Columbus serves burritos and pizza to local residents, Border Patrol agents and visitors from other parts of the country seeking a glimpse of life on the frontier. The motto painted on the wall proclaims “Life is good in the Borderland.”
“This is the sleepiest little town you could think of,” said Adriana Zizumbo, 31, who was raised in Columbus and owns the café with her husband. “The only crisis we’re facing here is a shortage of labour. Fewer people cross the border to work than before, and Americans don’t want to get their hands dirty doing hard work.”
President Donald Trump has shut down part of the government over border security and his plan to build a wall along the border with Mexico. In a primetime speech Tuesday night, he painted a bleak picture of life in towns like Columbus.
He said border residents were suffering through a “humanitarian crisis” and he described a landscape scarred by violence and prowled by “vicious coyotes and ruthless gangs.” But that is not how Zizumbo sees it. People in Columbus, she said, opposed the idea of a wall by about a “90-to-10 margin.”
“Enough about the wall already,” she said. “We have other problems here that need fixing.”
Extending nearly 3,000 kilometres from southern Texas to a fence jutting out into the Pacific Ocean in San Diego, the U.S. border with Mexico is as long and as varied as the terrain. Remote spots in the desert like Columbus, a town of 1,600 people about 130 km west of El Paso, are sleepily tranquil. In cities like El Paso and San Diego, the growing number of migrant families pushing for entry to the United States has generated crowds and controversy, with migrants packed into detention centres and bus stations, and clashes at the fences between rock-throwing immigrants and federal agents. On Tuesday, as Trump made the case that the country is in the midst of an immigration crisis, the New York Times sent correspondents to Mexico and to the four states along the bor- der — California, New Mexico, Arizona and Texas — and found few who shared the president’s sense of alarm.
Many said there was indeed a humanitarian crisis unfolding, but they blamed the Trump administration for worsening it with a series of policies aimed at deterring Central American migrants from making the journey. Those policies, many of which have been blocked by legal challenges, have failed to stop the flood of migrants. But they have succeeded in escalating tensions, overwhelming volunteer shelters and putting those seeking asylum from violence at renewed risk of health threats and other problems once they arrive in the United States.
The border has long been more than a barrier or a headline. It is the setting of a unique- ly American story, a binational place of contradictions and commerce.
One afternoon a few months ago, a Latino teenager walked through the bus station in the southern Texas city of McAllen, a transit hub where hundreds of apprehended immigrants are dropped off daily by the authorities. The boy was not fresh from detention. He was a native Texan. He was visiting a relative and wore a black T-shirt correcting any misconceptions about his identity. It read “Relax Trump, I’m legal.”
That was the vibe along many parts of the border Tuesday, before Trump’s speech.
A cattle rancher in southern Arizona said he had travelled to Mexico a day earlier, and he saw no emergency. The lines were long — officials have shut down the number of ways people there can cross — but there were no signs of conflict or people pressing to get in.
“There is no border problem, except for ones we are causing,” said the rancher, who said he had not had any problems with illegal border crossers on his property and who asked not to be identified out of fear of retribution from strident supporters of Trump’s planned border wall. “There’s no need for a bigger wall. There is not a border crisis down here.”
Some of the worsening problems, some city officials have said, are a result of the federal government’s own management of the border. In El Paso and other cities in California and Arizona, the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency has in recent weeks released thousands of immigrants unannounced onto city streets, forcing city officials and migrant shelter operators to scramble to accommodate them. “They were just being dropped off with nothing — no money, nothing,” said Kevin Malone, one of the founders of the San Diego Rapid Response Network, which has dealt more frequently with unannounced releases. “They’re setting people up for failure every step along the way. This is a contrived emergency. They don’t have to be doing it like this.”
From 2014 to 2017, local municipalities in south Texas had to spend $873,000 (U.S.) on immigrant relief efforts, expanding staffing, securing migrant assistance centres and maintaining restrooms, generators and sleeping quarters.
“Then we get blasted for being sanctuary cities — get real,” said Jim Darling, the mayor of McAllen. “It’s not our fault. The feds are the ones dropping them off. What are we supposed to do?”
Some of those along the border, to be sure, believe the government should not be rushing to accommodate new migrants but fortifying to keep them out. James Johnson, a prominent farmer in Columbus, said he had voted for Trump in 2016 and continues to support the president, including his proposal for a wall.
“Listen, we need security and a wall will provide that security,” said Johnson, 43, whose family-owned onion and chile farm sits along a stretch of the border. “I’m100 per cent for the wall. Trump is bold in pushing for it.”