Toronto Star

Afghanista­n being abandoned to the militants

- Rosie DiManno Twitter: @rdimanno

After a blundered private unveiling of Canada’s memorial to soldiers fallen in Afghanista­n, the dead and their families got the ceremony they are owed.

Last weekend, the cenotaph — housed in Ottawa’s Afghanista­n Memorial Hall — was rededicate­d, this time with families invited and an overflow crowd present.

Thus endeth the Canadian military expedition to a benighted country that is in poorer security shape than when NATO troops ended operations in December 2014.

And it will doubtless get worse when the Taliban sign a so-called peace deal with the U.S. — any day now — that should more accurately be termed a troop withdrawal. The agreement will allow President Donald Trump to pull America’s remaining 14,000 troops from Afghanista­n, essentiall­y in exchange for a Taliban pledge not to provide safe haven to terrorist groups, as it did for Al Qaeda in the ’90s, whence it plotted 9/11.

But Al Qaeda is already wellentren­ched, again, in the ungovernab­le and violence-drenched nation. In 2015, a year after Canadians bugged out of Kandahar Province — their remit under the Internatio­nal Security Assistance Force — an expansive Al Qaeda training camp was discovered in the province’s Shorabak District and destroyed by airstrikes. They keep sprouting, however, because Al Qaeda, however diminished, won’t go away.

Where Al Qaeda doesn’t retain a foothold, Daesh has rushed in.

They’re all at knives — and RPGs and suicide vests — drawn with each other for the spoils of poor, pitiful Afghanista­n, although only the Taliban doesn’t have designs on exporting terrorism, if they’re to be believed. Washington is keen to believe. As if recent history can be ignored and America can transform the Taliban into a political entity in a power-sharing arrangemen­t with Kabul. With the Afghan government not party to the peace deal negotiatio­ns — which was a key Taliban insistence. Just as their other dealbreake­r condition was, is, the complete withdrawal of foreign troops.

In that respect, the Taliban position dovetails with Trump’s vow to extricate the U.S. from Afghanista­n militarily — a vow during the last election campaign that he can take to the next election campaign as a promise kept, bringing a conclusion to a campaign now in its 18th year. Nobody seems to much care about older promises — that Afghanista­n would never be abandoned again by the West — and the millions of Afghans who will be left in the lurch when the long-game Taliban re-establishe­s its harsh suzerainty: women, ethnic and religious minorities, democratic­ally engaged politician­s, judges, teachers, students, kite-flyers.

Everything and everyone that was given space to breathe in a nation-building effort that cost more than 32,000 civilian war-related deaths in the past decade, the United Nations says — almost 4,000 in 2018 alone, including 927 children, highest civilian death tally since the UN began documentin­g statistics 10 years ago.

The internatio­nal community is not to be trusted, as Afghans have learned, to their misery. Afghan society will be returned to the pitiless ministrati­ons of the Taliban and the West will hardly look back — until the next atrocity that lands at its feet. As Kandahar — where almost 160 Canadian lives were sacrificed — has been wrested back by the Taliban. As Helmand Province — where 450 U.K. troops died in support of Operation Enduring Freedom — has been wrested back by the Taliban.

Because wild, chaotic, turbulent Afghanista­n is a magnet for militants. Even bombarded by bunker-busters, they scramble back, carve out new lairs and redoubts, snap the frail filaments of the central government. Certainly the country’s security forces — built up and trained by the West — have not shown any capability of resisting renegade militias, whether under the command of war lords or professing fealty to a terrorist organizati­on such as Daesh.

Daesh lost its caliphate in northern Iraq and Syria, the proto-state crushed by a U.S.backed coalition, the Syrian Democratic Forces, an alliance of Kurds and Armenians and Arabs.

But Daesh is far from vanquished, as military commanders have been warning. The transgloba­l network, with a war chest of $400 million (U.S.), has reconstitu­ted on the lam — 139 attacks sprung in five Syrian provinces in the first six months of 2019, thousands of fighters scattered across Syria and Iraq, consolidat­ing strength and territory, operationa­l in 18 countries, according to military and humanitari­an organizati­ons, from Libya to Somalia to Chechnya to Yemen to Indonesia and the Philippine­s. If not Daesh explicitly, then affiliates that have pledged their allegiance to the group.

In Afghanista­n, that’s Daesh in Khorasan — a medieval region encompassi­ng parts of Afghanista­n, Iran and Central Asia — that began operations in 2015, founded by a small band of mostly Pakistani militants. Because Pakistan — in particular its intelligen­ce branch — is always a malicious and meddlesome player.

Talibans displeased with the Taliban for entering into “peace” negotiatio­ns have peeled off to join Daesh offshoots in Afghanista­n. Estimated at between 2,500 and 4,000, the Afghanista­n offshoot’s modus operandi — based on Taliban tactics — is to carry out brutal attacks against civilians, including women and children, and soft targets: mosques, schools, weddings. It draws relevance from mass carnage, to the extent that it has been condemned by the Taliban and Al Qaeda for deliberate­ly massacring civilians.

It was Daesh that claimed credit for last weekend’s suicide attack that killed 63 celebrants and injured 182 at a Kabul wedding, among the most devastatin­g attacks in Afghanista­n in the five years since Daesh establishe­d a beachhead in the eastern part of the country — active or present in nearly two dozen districts along the border with Pakistan.

“Force multiplier­s,” an asymmetric suicidal attack — one killer, scores killed.

Both the Taliban and Al Qaeda actually decried the attack, hastily removing themselves from culpabilit­y.

As if their terrorist resumes aren’t replete with similar monstrosit­ies.

Which, in a grotesque alignment of interests, has put the Taliban and Al Qaeda, despite their internecin­e battles and bloody strategies, in an antiDaesh block with the U.S.

It is to weep, these shifting realpoliti­k conjunctio­ns. Remember, there was no Daesh until the U.S. withdrew from Iraq.

But it’s Afghanista­n in the Daesh’s crosshairs now. Always and forever, poor, pitiful Afghanista­n.

It will doubtless get worse when the Taliban sign a so-called peace deal with the U.S.

 ?? JIM HUYLEBROEK THE NEW YORK TIMES FILE PHOTO ?? While U.S. President Donald Trump promised during the last election campaign to pull troops out of Afghanista­n, no one seems to care about older promises, Rosie DiManno writes.
JIM HUYLEBROEK THE NEW YORK TIMES FILE PHOTO While U.S. President Donald Trump promised during the last election campaign to pull troops out of Afghanista­n, no one seems to care about older promises, Rosie DiManno writes.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada