Toronto Star

U.S. curtails birth control, again

-

The following excerpt is from an editorial in The New York Times.

Only days after surprising the nation by striking down a strict antiaborti­on law in Louisiana, the Supreme Court under Chief Justice John Roberts reminded Americans once again that it is no friend to reproducti­ve rights, or to the vast majority of women who will use some form of birth control in their lifetime.

In a decision Wednesday, the justices dealt another blow to the birth control mandate under the Affordable Care Act. In the wake of the 7-2 ruling in Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvan­ia, “between 70,500 and 126,400 women would immediatel­y lose access to no-cost contracept­ive services,” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted in her dissent, citing a government estimate.

The Little Sisters of the Poor is an order of Catholic nuns who are religiousl­y opposed to birth control.

They’re also opposed to the ACA’s birth-control mandate, which says that insurance plans sponsored by large employers must include all forms of birth control approved by the Food and Drug Administra­tion at no additional cost.

The litigation on this issue has been continuing for the better part of the past decade. Then the Trump administra­tion, which has consistent­ly sided with anti-abortion activists, came along, vastly expanding the exemptions to the contracept­ion mandate so that any company that isn’t publicly traded can opt out, if it has a religious or a moral objection. States sued to block those regulation­s, the case made it to the Supreme Court and here we are: The court has upheld the Trump administra­tion’s expanded exemptions to the mandate, on administra­tive grounds, making it harder for many thousands of American women to get birth control.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada