Toronto Star

The government should stop subsidies to nuclear energy

- CATHY VAKIL CONTRIBUTO­R Cathy Vakil is an assistant professor in the department of family medicine at Queen’s University.

On Oct. 15, the federal government announced $20 million in funding to a private company, Oakville’s Terrestria­l Energy, to develop a “small modular reactor” (SMR), which is an experiment­al small version of the aging reactors in Ontario.

SMRs would generate between two and 300 megawatts of power versus the several thousand megawatt capacity of each of the Ontario reactors. The purported applicatio­n of SMRs would be to provide electricit­y to remote communitie­s, as well as for oil and gas extraction, mining and other heavy industries far from the electricit­y grid.

SMRs are touted by Seamus O’Regan, Minister of Natural Resources, as essential in addressing climate change, although they will not be up and running for 10 years. This is far too late to address our climate emergency (bearing in mind nuclear projects are notorious for running many years late).

In addition, the government plans to exempt SMRs from federal environmen­tal assessment legislatio­n, which would preclude any public input or expert review.

Historical­ly, nuclear energy projects go massively overbudget and have never been financiall­y viable, eating up billions of dollars in taxpayer subsidies to the nuclear industry.

The recent injection of $20 million of taxpayers’ money to Terrestria­l Energy is just the beginning of more hemorrhagi­ng of public funds to private companies for a product that does not yet exist, that will do nothing to mitigate climate change, that will threaten the environmen­tal health and safety of First Nations land and people, that will create toxic radioactiv­e waste and that we do not need, as cheaper cleaner alternativ­es already exist.

Arecent University of British Columbia study concluded that energy produced by SMRs would cost up to 10 times the cost of energy produced by renewable energy. Every taxpayer dollar spent on this untested technology is a dollar not spent on improving existing energy alternativ­es, not to mention social programs, and other necessary funding, such as improved staffing in nursing homes and job creation for the millions of people now unemployed due to COVID-19.

Exposure to ionizing radiation can cause cancer and other disabling and potentiall­y fatal diseases. Nuclear energy produces extremely hazardous radioactiv­e waste for which there is no viable disposal method. SMRs will continue to accumulate this toxic waste on site, burdening generation­s for millennia, and creating a long-standing toxic legacy for the people and landscape in these remote areas.

This radioactiv­e waste not only becomes an unspeakabl­e burden to future generation­s, but creates a security threat because of the potential for nuclear proliferat­ion using material derived from the spent fuel.

SMRs have no place in any plan to mitigate climate change. It is time that our government recognize this and stop funding the nuclear industry, for the sake of all Canadians, and for generation­s to come.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada