Toronto Star

Trying to fix the earth

Advocates raise awareness of regenerati­ve agricultur­e, which traps carbon in the soil

- ROSA SABA

Across Canada, farms, vineyards and ranches are adopting regenerati­ve agricultur­e, a system of practices meant to regenerate soil from the damages of convention­al farming, and draw carbon out of the air.

Canadian farmers and advocates for the small but growing movement say the next pieces of the puzzle are consumer awareness and policy.

What is regenerati­ve agricultur­e?

The purpose of regenerati­ve agricultur­e is to regenerate soil instead of degenerate it the way convention­al farming does. Done correctly, the regenerate­d lands should also draw carbon from the air and hold it, or sequester it, in the soil. Farmers and advocates say this could help offset emissions created by the convention­al agricultur­e sector.

Brooks White, of Borderland Agricultur­e in Manitoba, describes regenerati­ve agricultur­e as five pillars that work in harmony: the use of no-till practices, meaning the soil is not turned over by equipment; the increased diversity of crops; the use of cover crops to protect

soil and draw in carbon; the integratio­n of livestock into the farm; and the fostering of living roots to improve soil structure and health.

“The word regenerati­ve basically means concentrat­ing on your soil life, so that your soil gets better,” explained André Houle of Houle Farm in Curran, Ont.

Regenerati­ve agricultur­e often goes hand in hand with organic farming, but not always. Houle’s farm, for example, is organic, while White’s isn’t.

However, White says regenerati­ve agricultur­e has enabled him to cut down on the practices that organic farming doesn’t allow, like the use of herbicides and pesticides or chemical fertilizer.

“We have reduced our fertilizer use by 75 per cent, and we have reduced our chemical applicatio­ns by 50 per cent,” he said, noting that his farm also burns a fraction of the diesel that many other farms do.

For many farmers, the switch to regenerati­ve agricultur­e stems from concern about climate.

A third-generation farmer near Ottawa, Houle made the decision to go organic and regenerati­ve in 2018 after the farm had been operating convention­ally for around 30 years, growing only corn and soybeans.

The switch “had been building in me for a few years,” said Houle. After doing some research, the proverbial straw that broke the camel’s back was a presentati­on by the non-profit organizati­on Regenerati­on Canada at their annual Living Soil Symposium.

Convention­al farming had, over 30 years, made Houle’s soil compact, dry and void of life. He needed bigger, stronger equipment to work it than was needed decades before.

“The more you look into it, the more you can’t believe what you did before. It’s really an eyeopener,” said Houle. He began implementi­ng crop rotation, cover crops and livestock, diversifie­d his crops, and eliminated herbicides and pesticides.

Within three years, Houle has seen radical changes in the soil and the farm overall. Worms are coming back, he said, as are the butterflie­s he remembers from when he was younger.

This kind of shift is exactly what Regenerati­on Canada founder Gabrielle Bastien is trying to spark in farmers across Canada.

The organizati­on was founded in 2017 to promote soil regenerati­on in order to mitigate climate change and foster healthy food systems, said Bastien.

The Living Soil Symposium, which runs until Friday online, is one of the initiative­s the organizati­on is running to help spread the word — not only among farmers, but among consumers and policy-makers. Another initiative is their interactiv­e map, which plots regenerati­ve farms across Canada.

“We’ve definitely seen more and more farmers implementi­ng these practices throughout Canada,” said Bastien.

But that doesn’t mean these practices are new.

Houle and White are implementi­ng practices that older generation­s used, even their own families on the very land they now farm.

White has also looked back even further and learned from the way wild bison used to roam. He started mimicking those natural patterns with his bison, over time creating a healthy root system, he said.

Over the years they have been able to increase the number of animals they feed on the same piece of land, he said — the practices have improved the land’s health and his economic output.

The economic benefits of going regenerati­ve

In fact, White didn’t begin using regenerati­ve practices because of the environmen­t.

A fifth-generation farmer who grew up on a typical Western prairie grain farm, White “stumbled” into regenerati­ve practices, as he puts it, “out of economic necessity.”

White’s father was a “pioneer” of no-till farming in the 1980s, he said. When White returned from school to the farm, he decided to bring in bison, almost 20 years ago. Slowly, like putting a puzzle together, they began implementi­ng more regenerati­ve practices, he said.

For example, in 2011, the farm suffered a flood that rendered more than 2,000 hectares unusable for the usual seeding. But the bison still needed to eat, so later in the summer when things got a bit dryer, White seeded some cover crops on part of the land as an emergency food source.

The next year, the swaths of land planted with cover crops had recovered from the flooding and were good enough to be seeded with cash crops. The rest of the land was still damaged from the flood and unusable.

Now, every year they plant a certain number of hectares with cover crops and nothing else, a process known as crop rotation. That allows the soil to rest and recover. They also implemente­d more variety in what they grow, making the farm less vulnerable to largescale losses.

All these decisions have made the farm more economical­ly viable, said White.

For Houle, too, the economic benefit is obvious.

After years of working a fulltime job while farming, in recent years he’s been able to cut down on his hours, and expects to soon be only farming.

He’s not buying chemicals anymore, or buying seed every year since he started saving his own. He gets more of a premium for his product, and he’s using much less equipment and gas.

“It costs you nothing, really, to put it in the ground, except for the labour and your machines,” said Houle. “You get less of a crop, but the crop is much higher quality.”

White thinks regenerati­ve agricultur­e as a movement is growing. But for it to change at a larger scale, especially on the largest farms in Canada, it needs to be economical­ly driven, he said.

“The best way for that economic incentive to happen is for people to ask for their food to be grown this way,” he said.

Ann Sperling, of Sperling Vineyards in Kelowna, B.C., and Southbrook Vineyards in Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ont., agrees with White that in order to make regenerati­ve agricultur­e the norm, consumers need to be on board.

Some people, including Sperling, think policy is a big part of this. Sperling thinks farms that are proven to be sequesteri­ng carbon should get a credit as an incentive, for example.

In Canada, farmers who want to label their food as organic have to go through a certificat­ion process, which involves inspection­s of their farms and practices. That way, if consumers see something with “organic” on the label, they can trust that the product was made under a certain set of rules.

But farmers are divided on whether this would work for regenerati­ve agricultur­e.

Sperling thinks that, at some point, some kind of required certificat­ion would be helpful. But right now it’s more important to spread awareness, she said.

Bastien noted that there are two schools of thought when it comes to certificat­ion. One option is to audit practices, like organic certificat­ion. But others say it’s better to monitor outcomes, such as through carbon levels and soil health, to prove that regenerati­on is actually happening.

There are a number of regenerati­ve certificat­ion programs that already exist in North America that use one or the other approach, but unlike organic certificat­ion, none of them is required in Canada in order for a farmer to call their farm regenerati­ve.

Part of that consumer demand goes beyond the grocery store and into restaurant kitchens.

Carl Heinrich, of Toronto’s Richmond Station, has been a champion of organic and regenerati­vely grown food for years, even growing his own plot on the New Farm in Creemore, Ont., since 2017.

But he knows he’s in a minuscule minority, and that most consumers, restaurant owners included, choose their food with price as top priority.

“The food needs to be the same price to the consumer as convention­al food,” said Heinrich.

He wants to see the regenerati­ve movement grow faster than the local or organic movements did. For that to happen, he believes policy needs to step in. He noted that the farmers at the New Farm helped create a national alliance of farming organizati­ons called Farmers for Climate Solutions that he hopes represents more seats at the policy table for regenerati­ve farmers.

For Houle, the journey to regenerati­ve agricultur­e has been good for his soil, good for the climate, and good for him.

He feels like he’s not only making his farm economical­ly and environmen­tally sustainabl­e, but also getting back to his roots and enjoying farming again.

“In my case, it worked out pretty good,” he said. “I won’t be rich doing it, but I’ll be happy doing it.”

 ??  ?? André Houle, a third-generation farmer near Ottawa, made the decision to farm organicall­y and regenerati­vely in 2018.
André Houle, a third-generation farmer near Ottawa, made the decision to farm organicall­y and regenerati­vely in 2018.
 ??  ?? Brooks White, seen with his wife, Jen, says that regenerati­ve farming techniques have allowed them to cut down on the use of chemicals and diesel fuel on their bison farm in Manitoba.
Brooks White, seen with his wife, Jen, says that regenerati­ve farming techniques have allowed them to cut down on the use of chemicals and diesel fuel on their bison farm in Manitoba.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada