Toronto Star

How do you solve a problem like traffic?

Technologi­cal solutions and new initiative­s aim to help ease the gridlock on Toronto’s roads

- DOMINIQUE RITTER THE TORONTO STAR, HAS PARTNERED WITH MARS TO HIGHLIGHT INNOVATION

Gridlock is a special kind of grief, with its own unique stages: inventing expletives, using the horn as an expression of your internal wail and, eventually, begrudging acceptance. (You’ll know you’ve reached the final stage when you can say the words “Hwy. 401” without twitching.)

For years, Toronto has been grappling with a skyrocketi­ng population, crumbling infrastruc­ture and chronicall­y underfunde­d public transit. And these compoundin­g challenges have created a massive traffic-induced deficit. We’re losing time — drivers spend an estimated 199 hours per year in gridlock, while the TTC averaged 253 delays per day, totalling 65 hours.

According to Tomtom, a Dutch geolocatio­n technology company, last year it took longer to drive 10 kilometres in Toronto (29 minutes) than in almost any other city on the planet.

“We made it to number three in the world and that’s an awful place to be,” says Mahtot Gebressela­ssie, an assistant professor in the faculty of environmen­tal and urban change at York University.

So how can the GTA — with its six million-plus citizens, two million commuter cars, endless constructi­on and mounting road rage — start to meaningful­ly address these issues? Fortunatel­y, there are some innovative technologi­es and smart solutions to help us get unstuck.

Make streets smarter

One of the fundamenta­l ways to reduce congestion is to optimize the roads and intersecti­ons, without asking a single commuter to change their habits. In the industry they call this “managing demand” and according to Kurtis McBride, CEO and co-founder of Kitchener traffic tech giant Miovision, it can yield substantia­l improvemen­ts.

Among the things currently impeding the flow of vehicles and people through Toronto is an epidemic of bad timing and wrong signals. Specifical­ly: old-school traffic lights stuck on set schedules that don’t reflect how or how many road users travel through intersecti­ons. One city-sanctioned solution is a cohort of traffic agents dispatched to busy junctions, who act as maestros amid the unruly commuter orchestra to make sure everyone is doing what they should.

The long-term fix, however, is to better understand the problem and start sending the right signals.

A new generation of traffic tools has taken intersecti­ons well beyond green-yellow-red to include AI-enhanced 24/7 video surveillan­ce, data collection and analysis, as well as the ability to optimize traffic signals on the fly. At Miovision, they think of their product line as a smartphone with apps. It’s a single piece of hardware that, with software updates, can accomplish increasing­ly sophistica­ted tasks.

A 360-degree intersecti­on camera, for instance, can assess vehicle flow, pedestrian safety or the efficiency of bike lanes, or it can be enhanced (using cellular or infrared technology) with the power to trigger signal changes that provide, say, priority for emergency vehicles. Miovision technology is currently used in about 20 per cent of all North American signals. Within Toronto, Miovision is gathering multi-modal data at 100 high-volume intersecti­ons.

Make maintenanc­e easier

In efforts to reduce pothole slaloms and pavement-crack lurches, new technologi­es are ready to fill in.

“The City of Toronto is seeing challenges in maintainin­g its existing infrastruc­ture,” says Emil Sylvester Ramos, co-founder and CEO of iris R&D, a Burlington-based company that automates roadmainte­nance monitoring. While there is no easy fix to tackle all systemic issues at once, innovative tech can provide repeatable solutions at a lower cost, which can help overcome those challenges.

What iris R&D offers is tech that acts like an infrastruc­ture nanny, leveraging AI to support public works in assessing the state of street signs, road-surface markings, cracks and potholes through the use of cameras on municipal vehicles. Problems can be identified with less labour and fewer emissions, and the informatio­n can be automatica­lly processed to create work orders. The result is an up-todate picture of a municipali­ty’s maintenanc­e needs and an opportunit­y to quickly repair trafficcau­sing snafus.

Build better options

To lure drivers out of their cars, the alternativ­es need to be safe, but also reliable and efficient, says Qiming Weng, CEO of Drop Mobility, a Toronto company that helps municipali­ties and institutio­ns build electric bike-share and mobility solutions. Fortunatel­y, when it comes to bike-share programs, “Toronto has one of the biggest systems in the world.”

What Weng would like to see more of is the rollout of e-bike offerings in suburban areas, such as Mississaug­a, which announced its new program in early April. “Most cities in the world understand that bikes have to be part of the conversati­on — they’re like the glue between these bigger infrastruc­ture projects. You need the last mile,” he says.

Put a price on traffic

Another strategy to unsnarl roadways is to make drivers pay for the privilege.

In June, Manhattan is expected to roll out a $15 toll, the first congestion pricing in North America. Similar programs in London, Stockholm and Singapore have shown that financial disincenti­ves do influence commuters to use other forms of transporta­tion.

To be effective, however, they need to be accompanie­d by big boosts in public transit. In Toronto, projects such as the Ontario Line and Eglinton LRT are still years away from completion. And complicati­ng the current system in the GTA is disjointed pricing for many suburban commuters, who may need to use two or more services to reach the city centre.

“Integratio­n is a big problem,” says Gebressela­ssie, “but I think that discounted fares and free transfers for people who are using multiple transit operators is a good start.” Earlier this year, the TTC joined Ontario’s “one fare” program, which allows users to transfer more affordably and seamlessly from the TTC to the GO Train or Brampton, MiWay, York and Durham regional transit systems.

For those who fall outside the area currently serviced by high-functionin­g public transit, there may be a custom fix. Hop In, a Markham startup, helps employers in subconveni­ent locations better connect with employees by crafting data-driven commuting solutions, like rideshare and shuttles.

Set the agenda

Earlier this year, the Toronto Region Board of Trade announced a task force to “identify and champion practical, high-impact solutions for Toronto’s congestion crisis.” They’re expected to present their report by the end of 2024.

McBride, who is one of the task force’s 21 members, hopes “the recommenda­tions touch on various facets of what it means to reduce congestion. It can’t just be about pushing more cars down the road.”

Even implementi­ng 20 per cent of the recommenda­tions could yield a 80 per cent improvemen­t, McBride says. But like Toronto traffic itself, these fixes aren’t moving fast. And, until the situation starts to improve, when you’re stuck in gridlock wondering, Is this my jam? Remember, it is your jam. “I think we always assume that traffic is someone else’s fault. But the reality is that we all contribute to it,” says McBride.

And, according to Gebressela­ssie, that also means we can also be part of the solution. “We can play a role in reducing traffic congestion, for instance, by driving less.” TORSTAR, THE PARENT COMPANY OF

 ?? R.J. JOHNSTON TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO ?? According to Tomtom, last year it took longer to drive 10 kilometres in Toronto (29 minutes) than in almost any other city on the planet.
R.J. JOHNSTON TORONTO STAR FILE PHOTO According to Tomtom, last year it took longer to drive 10 kilometres in Toronto (29 minutes) than in almost any other city on the planet.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada