Tri-County Vanguard

Yarmouth units open to consolidat­ion talks

- TINA COMEAU AND CARLA ALLEN TRI-COUNTY VANGUARD

Two municipal units in Yarmouth County overwhelmi­ngly embraced motions last week to hold a session to look at the pros and cons of consolidat­ion of the municipal units in the county.

The Town of Yarmouth and the Municipali­ty of Yarmouth councils approved motions to approach the province to hold a facilitate­d session with the units to discuss the idea of consolidat­ion of the three municipal units in Yarmouth County.

The third municipali­ty in the county – the Municipali­ty of Argyle – was to hold its discussion on the matter at its council meeting on Tuesday evening, Jan. 14, which was after this newspaper’s press deadline. (Visit our website www.thevanguar­d.ca for a story about the outcome of that discussion.)

It’s been noted that having a facilitate­d session involving the units does not bind anyone to consolidat­ion. Rather it’s a chance to explore the benefits, ask questions, etc.

There was very little discussion when the matter came up on the town’s agenda at its monthly meeting on Jan. 9. Everyone around the table was supportive of the motion and the vote to approve it was unanimous.

“I believe that this is long overdue, at least the discussion part of it,” said Coun. Wade Cleveland. “I know that a lot of people think about savings or not savings, or duplicatio­n of different services. More than anything I see this as a move towards us becoming unified with a stronger voice and that together we are that much more strong.

“I cannot wait to see what the facilitato­r has to say,” he said. “I can’t wait to have this discussion.”

Yarmouth Mayor Pam Mood reiterated this is not a decision to proceed with consolidat­ion itself, but rather to feel out the issue.

“It’s just to put everything on the table, sort through and see where we want to go from there,” she said.

The Municipali­ty of Yarmouth is also open to participat­ing in a session with the Town of Yarmouth and Municipali­ty of Argyle in the near future to discuss potential consolidat­ion. At a special council meeting on Jan. 8, the municipali­ty approved holding a non-binding facilitate­d session, to be coordinate­d by the provincial minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing.

Councillor­s were receptive to the idea and Deputy Warden John Cunningham spoke at length on the topic.

“Believe it or not, I’m in support of this motion,” he said. “There are many reasons why

I’m supporting it. I never realized how much time and effort has gone into a lot of these municipal government cooperatio­n agreements.

“It’s tiring to sit down at a table, to sit down with three partners that own one piece of infrastruc­ture, and trying to get the funding partners to agree on stuff.”

YARMOUTH UNITS

He added there was a time he was dead-set against even considerin­g consolidat­ion but over the past three-and-a-half years his eyes have been opened.

“We waste a lot of time working on these inter-municipal agreements,” he said.

Coun. Patti Durkee said she looks forward to the fact-finding mission.

“Because essentiall­y that’s all it is, we’re getting facts. Therefore, in the future we can make a decision as to whether or not we think this is best for our community,” she said.

Warden Leland Anthony has a 25-year history in municipal politics and said consolidat­ion has been raised several times.

“It’s never moved forward. But in these 25 years I’ve come to realize technology changes. I realize that we have to step up and I won’t say accept change, but help move change forward,” he said. “I hope this change is for the residents of the municipali­ty and I’m 99 per cent sure it would be, but I don’t want to rush in any way, shape or form.”

In the days leading up to their discussion at the Argyle council table, some councillor­s from that municipali­ty had sought input from constituen­ts about their thoughts on the issue through postings on Facebook.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada