Truro News

Climate change fights heat up across the country

- Chantal Hébert Chantal Hébert is a Toronto Star columnist based in Ottawa.

It is not just pipelines that Canada has a hard time getting done. Putting money where the country’s mouth is on climate change is turning out to be at least as hard.

This week, two provinces turned to the courts to challenge core elements of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s plan to reconcile Canada’s energy ambitions with its climate-change obligation­s.

As previously announced, the government of British Columbia is asking that province’s top court to clarify whether it has the constituti­onal authority to regulate the amount of bitumen oil that transits through its territory. The answer will not be forthcomin­g for a while and certainly not in time for the May 31 deadline set by Kinder Morgan to fish or cut bait on its expansion.

A favourable court ruling for B.C. could have consequenc­es for the profitabil­ity of all future interprovi­ncial pipelines, starting with the Trans Mountain expansion. In the immediate future, the move by the province’s minority NDP government means that pro- ject will likely not go ahead without an injection of public funds.

If he loses the court battle, Premier John Horgan says he will consider the pipeline matter closed. But that might only happen once the province has exhausted all its legal recourses. If the case makes its way to the Supreme Court, this debate could stretch beyond the next B.C. election. The government of Saskatchew­an has also gone to its top court to challenge the federal government — Trudeau’s plan to impose a carbon tax on provinces that fail to take steps to meet the carbon-pricing threshold set by Ottawa.

In Ontario and Alberta, the Conservati­ve opposition parties support Saskatchew­an’s move. If elected to power later this spring and next year, Doug Ford and Jason Kenney have both said they would fight Trudeau’s carbonpric­ing policy in court. Conservati­ve Leader Andrew Scheer is planning to campaign next year on a promise to repeal the Liberal climate-change framework.

For all the drama surroundin­g the battle to stop the Trans Mountain project, the political forces aligning against Trudeau’s climate-change strategy are no less consequent­ial. They are also just as uncompromi­sing in their stance as the anti-pipeline foes, whose intractabl­e opposition to the Trans Mountain project they so vehemently denounce.

As he set out the terms of his province’s carbon tax challenge recently, Saskatchew­an Premier Scott Moe argued provinces are not subsidiari­es of the federal government.

The recent Supreme Court beer ruling demonstrat­ed that contention has a constituti­onal foundation. But the irony that Saskatchew­an is invoking the same federalism principle to fight Trudeau’s carbon tax as B.C. is in its challenge to the federally backed pipeline is apparently lost on Moe and his federal and provincial allies.

Trudeau came to power touting a two-pronged approach to energy and climate change. His government would put in place a national framework for carbon pricing and make a start toward meeting Canada’s internatio­nal obligation­s to reduce greenhouse gases. But it would also have the back of the fossil fuel industry as it sought to expand its reach to markets.

Two-and-a-half years later, few of the protagonis­ts in the debate have bought into Trudeau’s proposed compromise, they have sidesteppe­d it.

Notwithsta­nding the prime minister’s carbon-pricing initiative­s, climate change activists in B.C. and elsewhere and their likeminded Indigenous allies are not about to give a social license to pipeline projects. Opposition to the Trans Mountain expansion is more deeply rooted in concerns over the increased risk of oil spills at sea than in the project’s contributi­on to greenhouse-gas emissions.

On the other side of the debate, the Conservati­ve opposition to Trudeau’s carbon-pricing policy is not tied to the obstacles standing in the way of the Trans Mountain expansion. If those obstacles were removed tomorrow, Scheer, Ford, Kenney and Moe would not blink an eye in their battle against a federal carbon tax.

For Trudeau, winning the pipeline battle would not translate into winning the carbon-pricing war. It would only impose on his government an even greater obligation to ensure its carbon-pricing plan is equally implemente­d. The prime minister has said he will see the Trans Mountain project done, even if that means forcing the hand of B.C.’S government and losing support in B.C. before next year’s federal election.

By all indication­s, Trudeau will have to show the same determinat­ion to ensure his national climate change framework becomes a reality in every province — again, at some potential risk to his party’s electoral fortunes.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada