Truro News

Relationsh­ip status: it’s complicate­d

Understand­ing the ins and outs of commonlaw relationsh­ips as it relates to your nancial situation

- kenn.oliver@thetelegra­m.com Twitter: kennoliver­79 Kenn Oliver

Not too long ago, I wrote about marriage and planning a nancial future together after the honeymoon ends.

And while the advice o ered at the time holds true for those headed down the aisle — and those jetting o to Niagara Falls to elope — the reality is not everyone will get legally hitched.

Census data from Statistics Canada in 2016 indicates that while most couples continue to opt for traditiona­l marriages, more than 21.3 percent of Canadians were in common-aw relationsh­ips, up from just 6.3 per cent in 1981.

Despite the fact the number is on

the rise, the rights of people living in conjugal relationsh­ips are often misunderst­ood.

More than that, the precise de - nition of common law varies from province to province, and from one institutio­n to the next, be it the Canada Revenue Agency, employers and insurance companies.

“ ere's a feeling among people that common law is the same as a traditiona­l marriage and I think there's a lot of di erences,” says Rob Mclernon, a licensed insolvency trustee for Grant ornton in Nova Scotia.

“From a nancial planning standpoint, just because you guys are cohabiting and living under the same roof, you could be together 10 or 15 years, but you may not have any survivor bene ts under her pension unless there's a de ned bene ciary put in place. A lot of companies have varying of degrees of what they consider to be the spouse.”

In Nova Scotia, for instance, couples living together for two years are considered to be common law, but in order to obtain many of the same rights as legally married folks, they need to register as a domestic partnershi­p.

In Prince Edward Island, the Family Law Act states that two people living together for three or more years, or those in a conjugal relationsh­ip that has bore children are considered common law. In Newfoundla­nd — which leads the nation in formal marriage rates — it’s two years.

Even within those time-frame rules, there’s a great degree of difference­s when it comes to the division of property and assets, spousal support, child support and custody, and estate inheritanc­es.

“CRA, from a federal perspectiv­e, has a di erent de nition than the provinces than do, so depending on what you're looking at dealing with, you may be considered common law, you may not be considered common law,” explains Mclernon.

As far as the CRA is concerned, a couple is considered common law if they’ve lived together for more than 12 months, or if they’ve had a child together through natural birth or adoption, or if you together have primary custody of a child under the age of 18.

To get a better idea of the common-law rules across Canada and to avail of services like cohabitati­on agreements, common-law separation, and estate planning, check out commonlawr­elationshi­ps.ca.

Despite what many people believe — married and common-law couples alike — Mclernon says there’s no such thing as ling taxes together.

“ ere are two linkages between the two les because you guys are together, so they want to determine eligibilit­y for certain social programs — GST credits, child tax bene ts and things like that — so they want to have a linkage between the two les so they can determine household income, but… they're separate les.”

It’s also important to keep the taxman abreast of your marital status. Under federal law, one must notify the CRA within a month of it changing, but if you’re going through a separation — be it the dissolutio­n of a formal marriage of a common-law relationsh­ip — there’s a 90-day waiting period before making the change.

If you fail to correct your status, you will be asked to repay any bene ts received since the separation and there’s little to no room for negotiatio­n on the amount owed.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada