Valley Journal Advertiser

Still up in the air

Windsor’s amalgamati­on applicatio­n on hold as questions surround governance pilot project

- BY COLIN CHISHOLM WWW.HANTSJOURN­AL.CA Colin.Chisholm@HantsJourn­al.ca

While the Municipali­ty of West Hants is requesting that Windsor suspend its applicatio­n to the UARB to pursue amalgamati­on, the debate still has to be had in Windsor’s council chambers.

Despite the deadline of the memorandum of understand­ing between the two councils passing its expiration date, Windsor council gave no clear direction on its intention with the UARB applicatio­n during the regular council meeting on Feb. 27.

Coun. Jim Ivey said he’d like to see Windsor council withdraw its applicatio­n to the UARB, saying the province is no longer interested in forced amalgamati­ons.

“If you look at these two councils, we’ve probably met and had more discussion­s in the last 12 months than in the previous five years,” Ivey said.

“We haven’t always agreed, but it’s never been so disagreeab­le that anybody has walked away. We know what it’s like when you try to force something together, and that’s all that’s going to happen, and they’ve been pretty firm on that.”

Deputy mayor Laurie Murley said that more needs to be done between the two municipal units when it comes to working together.

She wants both units to consider becoming part of a new municipal modernizat­ion pilot project that would integrate more services without direct amalgamati­on.

But, Murley said, she still has questions about the project itself.

“There are things we don’t know about it. What will the terms of reference look like? How long will this pilot project run? What are the outcomes going to be? How will success be measured?” Murley said.

“We all know towns are paying unfair amounts of taxes, for infrastruc­ture in particular, and roads are the big one. Really rural (municipali­ties) don’t have to pay for the same things that we do. Will those outcomes help to level the playing field between towns and rurals and, if so, how will the inequities in roads and infrastruc­ture be dealt with?”

Murley said the road cost inequity would likely be dealt with through amalgamati­on, eventually.

“Because of that, I’m not in favour of removing ourselves from the amalgamati­on applicatio­n at this time,” she said, suggesting it be extended to incorporat­e the pilot project, whatever that may look like.

Coun. Shelley Bibby said she is in favour of combining or further integratin­g Windsor and West Hants, but said she wasn’t sure if forced amalgamati­on is the right way to do so.

ARC weighs in

Tom Calkin, a member of the Avon Region Citizens’ Coalition (ARC), was in attendance and answered some questions that council posed.

“You cannot, under the present legal structure under Nova Scotia law, have an amalgamati­on happen without it going through the public utilities board (UARB),” Calkin said.

“If you want us to carry on, we would try to help you with that; if you decided not to, we would understand that.”

He said that members were waiting to find out what Windsor council’s next steps would be.

“If we drag on and on and on, what credibilit­y do we have?” Calkin added.

He added that any applicatio­n to extend the UARB applicatio­n would have to be done through ARC, as that group initiated the process with its petition.

Calkin also said that the UARB didn’t respond to a request to extend the deadline to Feb. 28.

“We do know the process of having amalgamati­on, as defined by the act, is not an easy one,” he said. “We believe you can put your two councils together, shrink council sizes, shrink the overhead and save money in the long haul.”

He added that if the amalgamati­on idea is abandoned now, it will be much more difficult to revive it in the near future.

Ivey said ARC’s data is now dated, as much of it was gathered in 2015.

“We wait much longer and that’s going to be even more stale; we’re hanging onto something and it’s time to let it go,” Ivey said.

Windsor Mayor Anna Allen said a number of things have changed since ARC’s initial petition, which contained more than 2,600 signatures.

“At that time, it looked like the only change we could make was amalgamati­on,” she said. “It started off as a dirty word, and has become the only option for municipali­ties, and now it’s seen… as not a really good idea (by the province).”

She echoed the minister of municipal affair’s letter, which stated that the provincial government is no longer interested in financing amalgamati­ons.

Allen still wants to see change in terms of governance and regional service, ideally before this council’s mandate is over in 2020.

“If we can do that and the residents can see us doing that, I would say ARC did their job, because you brought us to that point,” Allen said.

She said that a joint planning strategy between the town and the municipali­ty is an obvious step that the two units could pursue.

Motion tabled

Ivey made a motion to cease the amalgamati­on applicatio­n through the UARB and the partnershi­p with ARC; however, that motion was tabled and will be addressed at a later date.

Murley made a motion asking for her questions about the pilot project be addressed. That motion was passed. Allen also suggested contacting the Municipali­ty of West Hants council to see if it would like to support that motion as well and send a joint letter to the minister.

She added that, for now, the amalgamati­on applicatio­n is up in the air.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Mayor Anna Allen
Mayor Anna Allen
 ??  ?? Deputy Mayor Laurie Murley
Deputy Mayor Laurie Murley
 ??  ?? ARC member Tom Calkin
ARC member Tom Calkin

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada