Vancouver Sun

Walkable neighbourh­oods high on Metro’s wish list

UBC survey: Many residents would give up larger homes to live in pedestrian-friendly areas

- BOB RANSFORD Bob Ransford is a public affairs consultant with Counterpoi­nt Communicat­ions Inc. He is a former real estate developer who specialize­s in urban land-use issues. Email: ransford@counterpoi­nt.ca Twitter: @Bobransfor­d

Your local environmen­t has a big impact on your health. Metro Vancouver residents understand that and they want to live in healthier neighbourh­oods. That’s the conclusion of a UBC study released earlier this week.

Planners have been talking for more than a decade about how neighbourh­ood design is linked to the behaviour of residents, their personal fitness and ultimately their health outcomes. They’ve worked hard to connect the dots between walkable neighbourh­oods and healthier residents. People now seem to be getting it.

This local study not only confirms this, but it also provides evidence that consumers in our own region prefer to live in walkable neighbourh­oods. The study found that nearly two-thirds of urban residents and 40 per cent of suburban residents in Metro Vancouver have a strong desire to live in a walkable neighbourh­ood, where they are able to walk to shops, food stores and restaurant­s. Less than 10 per cent and 20 per cent, respective­ly, have a strong desire to live in an auto-oriented neighbourh­ood, where they require a vehicle trip to access these everyday amenities.

Moreover, people are willing to make trade-offs to live in walkable neighbourh­oods, like giving up larger lots and bigger homes. Of the Vancouver residents who participat­ed in the survey, 52 per cent indicated they would strongly prefer living in a neighbourh­ood with closely spaced houses on smaller lots if it meant they were within five kilometres of work, school and other important destinatio­ns.

Interestin­gly, about twothirds of Vancouver survey participan­ts felt their neighbourh­ood is already very walkable.

Walkabilit­y is largely a function of proximity and connectivi­ty between places or how easily people can travel directly between their home, job and other important destinatio­ns.

One particular study finding really jumped out at me. It pointed to evidence that people who prefer and live in a walkable place report healthier lifestyles than those who prefer to, but don’t live in a walkable place. One measure was the incidence of high blood pressure among the survey participan­ts. People who prefer and live in a walkable neighbourh­ood reported significan­tly lower incidence of high blood pressure at 10 per cent, while those who would prefer to live in a walkable neighbourh­ood, but don’t, reported more than double the incidence of high blood pressure at 21 per cent. These figures were adjusted for demographi­c and income factors. These numbers seem to indicate that those of us who live in places where we have no choice but to drive know that our neighbourh­oods are not good for our health.

UBC’s Dr. Larry Frank was the lead researcher on this study, which surveyed 1,223 Metro Vancouver residents, asking them to choose between two scenarios — one more walkable and one more auto-oriented — in a series of illustrate­d neighbourh­ood trade-offs that defined their preference­s.

Frank, a planner in sustainabl­e transporta­tion who is associated with both UBC’s School of Community and Regional Planning and UBC’s School of Population and Public Health, is recognized as a global expert on the integratio­n of urban design, transporta­tion and public health. Thanks to the support of B.C.’s Real Estate Foundation, he was able to dive beyond theories and tap into the preference­s and opinions of “ordinary people” who live in our metropolit­an region.

This study of residentia­l preference­s that integrates health outcomes and looks at these trade-offs between walkabilit­y or reliance on the automobile and other factors such as housing costs, job access, lot or housing size, etc., is the first of its kind in Canada. It will help not only planners and public health profession­als, but also homebuilde­rs who have already begun to respond to the demand for new housing close to transit. It should also strengthen the argument that Metro mayors are making as they begin to prepare voters for the upcoming referendum on regional transit plans and sustainabl­e funding.

The survey concludes there is unmet demand for more walkable neighbourh­oods among those who live in very autoorient­ed neighbourh­oods in Metro Vancouver. Some 30 per cent of survey participan­ts who live in more auto-oriented neighbourh­oods in Vancouver would like to live in a neighbourh­ood within walking distance of a variety of shopping. In other areas of Metro Vancouver, 25 per cent of those who live in auto- oriented neighbourh­oods would like to live in those same walkable neighbourh­oods.

These findings align with Metro Vancouver’s regional growth strategy, which includes creating more compact urban areas and supporting growth that is concentrat­ed near frequent transit service. These regional goals are high- level, aspiration­al goals.

Perhaps the next piece of research that should be conducted is a survey that quantifies the actual amount of appropriat­ely zoned land in these growth concentrat­ion areas where housing can be developed at densities sufficient to make neighbourh­oods truly walkable.

Use the following link to access the study’s full report: http://health-design.spph.ubc.ca/files/2014/09/FinalRepor­t-Residentia­l-Preference­s-and-Public-Health-inMetro-Vancouver-_09262014. pdf

 ??  ?? A UBC study suggests that nearly two-thirds of urban residents in Metro Vancouver have a strong desire to live in a walkable neighbourh­ood. Shown here is a streetscap­e in UniverCity’s pedestrian-friendly community in Burnaby.
A UBC study suggests that nearly two-thirds of urban residents in Metro Vancouver have a strong desire to live in a walkable neighbourh­ood. Shown here is a streetscap­e in UniverCity’s pedestrian-friendly community in Burnaby.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada