Vancouver Sun

Indigenous consent is key to sustainabi­lity

Environmen­tal assessment status quo fails to measure up, write Martin Papillon and Thierry Rodon.

- Martin Papillon is an associate professor in the department of political science, Université de Montréal and Thierry Rodon is an associate professor in the political science department at Université Laval. They’re the authors of Indigenous Consent and Nat

On June 30, the Trudeau government quietly released its highly anticipate­d approach to revamping the federal environmen­tal assessment process. Expectatio­ns were high following the recommenda­tions of the government­appointed expert panel. Sadly, the Liberal government opted for the status quo over innovative change.

Nowhere is this more evident than in the proposed approach to Indigenous peoples’ role in the process. Despite what appears to be some generous language (Indigenous peoples will continue to be “consulted” and their rights and interests “considered.”) and some tweaking at the margins, this essentiall­y means business as usual.

The problem is that the status quo doesn’t work. Indigenous peoples legitimate­ly expect more than mere consultati­on and considerat­ion. When their rights and traditiona­l territorie­s are at stake, they expect to be decisionma­kers. Controvers­ies over the Energy East, Northern Gateway and Trans Mountain pipelines, as well as many other major developmen­t projects across Canada, suggest ignoring Indigenous claims for a greater say in the decisionma­king process can be costly. The resulting litigation process costs time and money, and ultimately contribute­s to the growing cynicism over Canada’s true commitment to political reconcilia­tion with Indigenous peoples.

In May 2016, Canada declared its full endorsemen­t of the UN Declaratio­n on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, including the principle of Indigenous free, prior and informed consent when projects affect their lands and communitie­s. The Truth and Reconcilia­tion Commission considers the UN declaratio­n a cornerston­e of reconcilia­tion. Indigenous peoples rightly expect the government to follow through on its commitment to start taking the principle of Indigenous consent seriously.

The proposed environmen­tal assessment reform does mention the UN declaratio­n, but it adopts a highly restrictiv­e approach to consent. Resource-project proponents would only be required to “seek” Indigenous consent through consultati­on, but not necessaril­y obtain it. The fear of a so-called “Indigenous veto” motivates this convoluted approach to Canada’s internatio­nal commitment.

We believe there is a better way. On the surface, achieving consent may indeed appear synonymous with granting a party veto power. But there’s a difference. A veto is when one party unilateral­ly rejects a project or policy. Consent, on the other hand, is achieved when parties mutually agree on a direction after a common deliberati­on process.

Our recent paper on the subject, published by the Institute for Research on Public Policy, calls for a two-pronged approach to implementi­ng free, prior and informed consent in Canada. First, Indigenous peoples should be recognized as full and equal governing partners in the decision-making process affecting their traditiona­l lands. Second, communitie­s should be able to express their consent through a mutually agreed upon impact assessment process that focuses on community concerns and is respectful of Indigenous world views, and legal and political traditions.

The federal government could look at existing Indigenous initiative­s for inspiratio­n. For example, the Squamish Nation in B.C. is shaping a new community-driven approach to impact assessment that focuses on Indigenous rights and traditiona­l land use. In 2014, they signed a deal with Woodfibre LNG that recognized the community’s own review process and decision-making authority on the project.

Ultimately, taking free, prior and informed consent seriously makes political and economic sense. It forces project proponents and regulatory agencies to be more responsive to the concerns of the local population, leading to projects that are more likely to be environmen­tally and socially sustainabl­e. It can also foster locally grounded economic developmen­t in partnershi­p with Indigenous communitie­s and help further the important national objective of advancing reconcilia­tion.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada