Vancouver Sun

Ottawa denies provincial minister’s claims about fish farm complaint

- ROB SHAW

B.C. Agricultur­e Minister Lana Popham’s claim that a complaint by the federal government prompted her to launch an investigat­ion of provincial scientists is not accurate, according to informatio­n from Ottawa.

The Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada issued a denial Tuesday that it was the source of concerns raised about the quality of provincial fish farm research and scientists, as Popham has told the legislatur­e repeatedly.

“Fisheries and Oceans Canada has not made any official complaints to the province of B.C. regarding the diagnostic work undertaken by the province’s Animal Health Centre,” the department

said in statement.

The statement contradict­s Popham, who several times Monday and Tuesday told the legislatur­e she launched a review of the quality of scientific research inside her ministry because DFO had complained.

“I want to emphasize that it was the Department of Fisheries and Oceans who called some of our data into question,” Popham told the house.

“We would take that very seriously because these are the partners that we work with as we look at fish pathology.”

The DFO denial also undermines days of defence Popham has attempted to craft.

Popham’s recent conduct as minister has been the subject of intense criticism after she wrote a threatenin­g letter to a coastal fish farm operator and publicly stated she had placed a government scientist under investigat­ion because he was the subject of complaints by First Nations who wanted him fired.

“It’s very concerning,” Liberal environmen­t critic Peter Milobar said. “Here we have DFO telling a completely different story than the minister has told for a few days in the house now, and I think the public has the right to get an answer from the minister that truly conveys what’s going on.”

After the DFO’s original denial, and following an interventi­on from the premier’s office late Tuesday, the federal agency revised a subsequent statement to say it “welcomes” Popham’s review, even if it did not officially complain on behalf of the federal government.

Popham’s problems started last week after she told Postmedia News her ministry was investigat­ing provincial fish pathologis­t Gary Marty’s research, following complaints from First Nations who wanted him dismissed. Marty wrote a 2015 report that refuted claims that fish farms pose a significan­t risk to wild salmon.

On Monday, Popham backtracke­d from her claims of an investigat­ion into Marty after the Opposition Liberals asked her to provide details on why the civil servant was under investigat­ion, who was conducting the review, what terms of reference governed the probe, and whether he could be fired. The Liberals accused Popham of political interferen­ce for targeting a government scientist.

Instead, Popham shifted to claim Marty was part of a larger review of research at the provincial lab, spurred by a complaint from the DFO about data quality.

“I’d like to reiterate there is no individual in the lab at the Ministry of Agricultur­e that is under investigat­ion,” she told the legislatur­e Monday.

“But when DFO raises concerns about our research, we take it seriously, as any lab who believes in integrity would.”

“The informatio­n that we provide to the DFO fish health audit program, it needs to be based on science,” Popham also said during question period on Monday. “We are verifying research produced by our Animal Health Centre to ensure that we’re making decisions based on science.”

Late Tuesday, Popham’s ministry admitted in a statement that it had received nothing in writing from the federal agency.

“The complaints from the agency have been verbal,” Agricultur­e Ministry spokeswoma­n Meghan McRae wrote in an email when asked to provide any record of communicat­ion between B.C. and the federal agency.

McRae pointed to an Oct. 14 CTV W5 story in which DFO scientist Kristi Miller was quoted as saying she believed Marty was either in a real or perceived conflict of interest because he has conducted research with coastal fish farm company Marine Harvest. A spokespers­on in the premier’s office said Popham and Miller had a subsequent conversati­on on Oct. 17 to expand upon her concerns. The DFO later confirmed that conversati­on, which outlined Miller’s concerns, was unofficial.

“While DFO has not lodged an official complaint, the B.C. government is being diligent in following up on the concerns raised by Dr. Miller,” the federal agency said in its statement late Tuesday.

Neither Popham nor Miller could immediatel­y be reached for comment.

The DFO has a memorandum of understand­ing with B.C. to test farmed salmon samples until March 31, 2020.

 ?? BRUCE STOTESBURY/VICTORIA TIMES COLONIST/FILES ?? B.C. Agricultur­e Minister Lana Popham told the legislatur­e the DFO “called some of our data into question” — but the agency says that was an unofficial conversati­on.
BRUCE STOTESBURY/VICTORIA TIMES COLONIST/FILES B.C. Agricultur­e Minister Lana Popham told the legislatur­e the DFO “called some of our data into question” — but the agency says that was an unofficial conversati­on.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada