ACES ON BRIDGE

inspection “Truth — Tacitus by haste is and confirmed and delay; uncertainty.” falsehood, by final this Consider deal contract from the of the fate four Politiken of hearts the likely World on Pairs. On a minor-suit lead, declarer can simply win and take a heart finesse. The best defense now is to shift to spades, but South wins the king, gives up a heart, and now has 10 tricks.

So a spade lead must be best for the defense. What happens if declarer puts up the king after a deceptive low spade lead, then leads a trump? This is what happened when Jaggy Shivsdasani of India was declarer.

Larry Cohen, East, won his heart ace and thoughtfully continued with the spade jack. (He was known to hold the queen from the earlier play in the suit, so he wanted to make sure his partner knew what was going on.) Steve Weinstein (West) overtook the jack and played a third spade. This forced declarer to ruff, then cross to dummy in diamonds and lead a low heart, putting in the jack when East discarded.

Declarer was all set to concede one trump and claim the rest, but Weinstein ducked his trump queen! Now declarer could cash the heart king and play on diamonds, but West could ruff the third round and exit with a spade, leaving declarer with a losing club for down one.

If declarer had played on diamonds without cashing the trump king, West would again have ruffed the third diamond and exited with the trump queen. Cut off from dummy forever, declarer would eventually have had to surrender a club to East. raise without ANSWER: partner’s a ruffing My major value rule with is (so not three this to would be an easy rebid of one no-trump over a response of one heart, for example). Here, I’m not so sure. Unless partner has at least three cards in both clubs and hearts, spades might play better — especially from his side. I can go either way, but I think I’d go with the field and bid one no-trump, with misgivings.