Vancouver Sun

THE POWER OF THE BROW

Pop culture has embraced notable shapes

- LISA ARMSTRONG London Daily Telegraph

It’s been a rough time for eyebrows. First, the recent dreadful news that not only had Mattel not asked Frida Kahlo’s family permission before they bastardize­d the late Mexican artist’s image into a Barbie doll, but that they’d lightened her (plastic) skin and — oh, the travesty — airbrushed out the famous monobrow.

Then Audrey Hepburn’s unmistakab­le brows were all over the place when it was announced that Hubert de Givenchy, her designer-in-chief, had died.

And concurrent­ly, there were all those ominous seeming pictures of Vladimir Putin leading up to his re-election, and those wispy, now-you-see-them-nowyou-don’t brows that were so at odds with his macho posturing. What’s in a brow? What isn’t? Hepburn’s were aristocrat­ic, glamorous and very dark (a bit beatnik). What had preceded were those spindly, semi-flattened arcs that look somewhat disfigurin­g to us now. Besides seeming modern and architectu­ral, her brow also became an emblem of all that is timeless.

Not that Hepburn’s brow was immutable. Exhibit A: Irving Penn’s 1951 portrait of her which shows an attenuated and etiolated iteration.

See how a brow can date you, as well as placing you firmly in a social class and — more contentiou­s, but true neverthele­ss — influence how intelligen­t you look.

At some point in Hepburn’s trajectory, Hollywood’s Brow Groomer to the Stars (assuming they had one) got hold of mark 1 and worked it into something much more distinctiv­e and bold.

The Hep-brow became a thing — revered, copied and, notwithsta­nding the fact that it has always been upheld as the paradigm of a classy brow.

Kahlo’s unibrow on the other hand was freighted with defiance, pain, cultural identity and no small degree of original beauty. One can imagine the conversati­on around Mattel’s boardroom table and how brave they all felt on agreeing that Fri-bie would have a marginally thicker brow than the standard doll.

I don’t completely condemn the toy brand’s appropriat­ion of Kahlo, although it would have been nice if they’d gone about it more intelligen­tly and sensitivel­y.

But, conceivabl­y, this could introduce millions of small girls to the notion that there are many ways a woman can feel valued. Instead of the usual boobalicio­us airhead Barbie, they now have an artist they can Google.

This could be the first time some of them ever encounter a natural womanly brow.

Not so long ago, British model and actress Cara Delevingne was custodian of The Natural Womanly Brow, but she’s ancient history compared to today’s batch of six-year-olds, although still highly regarded by older brow fanatics who, in another recent story, are paying thousands of dollars to have brow transplant­s to look like her.

So whose brows does the average six-year-old study?

Look no further than Adwoa Aboah’s, whose brow colour, density and texture seem to change by the day, as befits a model as culturally and socially diverse as the model-activist is.

Look and learn, children. What’s in a brow?

Everything.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? The Hep-brow, made famous of course by actress Audrey Hepburn, has been revered and copied.
GETTY IMAGES The Hep-brow, made famous of course by actress Audrey Hepburn, has been revered and copied.
 ?? FRIDA KAHLO MUSEUM ?? Mexican artist Frida Kahlo’s distinctiv­e monobrow showed defiance, pain, cultural identity and no small degree of original beauty in photograph­s, such as this one taken in 1926 by Guillermo Kahlo.
FRIDA KAHLO MUSEUM Mexican artist Frida Kahlo’s distinctiv­e monobrow showed defiance, pain, cultural identity and no small degree of original beauty in photograph­s, such as this one taken in 1926 by Guillermo Kahlo.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada