Vancouver Sun

MELNYK NEEDS TO TREAD CAREFULLY WITH OTTAWA FANS

Senators owner has burned through plenty of goodwill, and things could get worse yet

- SCOTT STINSON sstinson@postmedia.com twitter.com/scott_stinson

If Ottawa Senators owner Eugene Melnyk goes through with a couple of town hall meetings with fans, here is some free advice for him: Start with a good, long grovel. Then get more apologetic from there.

Though Melnyk has never seemed like one to accept blame for the struggles of his hockey franchise, and while he might be inspired by the sight of Don Cherry rallying to his defence on Saturday night, it would not be wise to bring a combative mood to a talk with the ticket-buying public, even if it would be highly entertaini­ng.

Though he might think he holds the ultimate bit of leverage in terms of a possible relocation (he doesn’t), Melnyk has burned through just about all of his goodwill among local fans. And he’s going to need to restore a lot of it if he’s going to get through the next few months without touching off a wholesale revolt.

This is not simply a situation where a team goes through an unexpected­ly bad season and angry fans want someone to blame.

Though the Sens went from the conference finals last year to almost dead last in the NHL this season, a lot of that can be explained by woeful goaltendin­g, which is not generally the kind of thing that starts a campaign to oust ownership. It’s deeper than that, and in the same way that politician­s can sometimes see their public support crater as a result of decisions they didn’t think were a big deal, Melnyk’s various missteps appear to have resonated with a chunk of the fan base far more than the win-loss record.

There was the departure of Daniel Alfredsson, first as a player, and then, when that fence was mended, as a member of the front office.

It would not be wise to bring a combative mood to a talk with the ticket-buying public, even if it would be highly entertaini­ng.

There is the general tightfiste­dness of the Sens in a league where every team’s biggest expense, player salaries, is strictly controlled. (It’s one thing when a baseball team says it cannot compete financiall­y with its wealthier rivals; it’s quite another when an NHL team chooses not to do it.)

There was the ouster of team president Cyril Leeder, replaced by a guy from Toronto who presided over the absolute worst days of that city’s soccer team, who has since left and was replaced by Melnyk himself.

There was the decision to jack up parking prices in Kanata. I have no idea if Melnyk was even aware of that one, but anecdotal evidence is it was a publicrela­tions disaster. The owner wouldn’t have caused any more ill will if he had shown up at the Canadian Tire Centre and poked fans in the eye on their way in the door.

Cap that off with his spectacula­rly ill-advised December musings about moving the team if attendance problems worsened. The subtext of those comments: This is my team, and if you people can’t make it profitable enough for me, I will take it to those who can.

(Side note: If the idea was to provide cover for his coach and GM, then to Melnyk I say, well played, sir. We’re out here screwing around with checkers and you are crushing a game of four-dimensiona­l chess.)

The thing is, it could still get much worse. There is the looming spectre of Erik Karlsson’s next contract, and even as Melnyk was rowing back his relocation comments in January, he avoided an enthusiast­ic endorsemen­t of keeping the captain in Ottawa beyond next season. He might even be right. If Karlsson is determined to test the free agent market in 2019, and if the Senators are offered a package that blows them away — NHL talent, high-end prospects, and a willingnes­s to take salary cap ballast — then there is a strong argument for taking that rather than risk losing Karlsson for nothing.

With all of that going on, there remains the question of the Senators’ arena, which has probably been solved with the LeBreton Flats developmen­t agreement, but could yet blow up as those negotiatio­ns proceed. Will the final deal include a significan­t dollop of public money, which is so often the case when profession­al teams build a new facility? Will Melnyk and partners end up with a sweet taxpayer subsidy for the building shortly after the team has moved its star player at a steep discount?

Forget sticking a finger in the eyes of fans. That would be like using a hot fireplace poker.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada