Vancouver Sun

MMIW lawyer’s interferen­ce claim disputed

Slams inquiry as ‘speeding towards failure’

- Brian Platt

OTTAWA • The national inquiry into missing and murdered Indigenous women has suffered yet another resignatio­n and a public airing of grievances, after an outgoing lawyer alleged government interferen­ce in its investigat­ive work.

But the government is rebutting that claim, pointing out that the inquiry was establishe­d with a broad mandate and exercises its evidence-collecting powers independen­tly of government.

It’s the latest in a long line of troubles for the inquiry, which recently had its request for a two-year extension rejected by the Liberal government and was instead given an extra six months to finish its work.

After having started up in September 2016, the inquiry is already on its third executive director and has seen numerous resignatio­ns and firings, often in murky circumstan­ces with little explanatio­n. Along with the two executive directors, the departures have included a commission­er, a director of communicat­ions, a director of operations, and multiple lawyers.

Breen Ouellette, who worked as a commission counsel for the inquiry at its Vancouver offices, posted online that he resigned on June 21. The resignatio­n was reported by The Canadian Press on Monday.

Breen, who is Metis, said in the statement that he believes the federal government has “undermined the independen­ce and impartiali­ty of the national inquiry” and that he cannot remain part of a process that he says “is speeding towards failure.”

As an example, he said the inquiry needs to be able to properly investigat­e allegation­s of “illegal and improper” foster-care apprehensi­ons.

“The national inquiry could use its powers to force government department­s to comply with investigat­ions into these allegation­s. The perpetrato­rs could be identified so that government­s could stop the misuse of billions of Canadian tax dollars by a few heartless bureaucrat­s seeking to advance their careers,” Breen wrote.

“However, interferen­ce by the federal government

(THE GOVERNMENT IS) TRYING TO KILL THE NATIONAL INQUIRY IN A DEATH BY A THOUSAND CUTS.

is underminin­g this important function of the national inquiry. Canadians deserve to know which provinces and territorie­s perpetuate this unnecessar­y and harmful spending of billions of tax dollars on foster-care apprehensi­ons.”

But a spokespers­on for Carolyn Bennett, Minister of Crown–Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs, disputed that claim.

“The Inquiry is independen­t from government and exercises its powers such as requesting evidence by subpoena under the federal and provincial inquiries acts,” said a statement sent on Tuesday.

“The Federal Government has not, in any way or at any time limited National Inquiry’s powers to gather evidence. Families have been demanding a national inquiry free from any political interferen­ce for many years — and that is what we have given them. It’s why we deliberate­ly wrote the Inquiry’s terms of reference to be as broad as possible, and why the Minister has not intervened in the Commission­ers’ work.”

The statement encouraged the inquiry “to use all of the resources at their disposal to seek the answers families have been demanding for decades.”

With the new deadline, the inquiry now has until Apr. 30, 2019, to submit a final report with recommenda­tions, instead of its request to have until Dec. 31, 2020.

Bennett said last month that the decision for a shorter extension was made after discussion­s with survivors and family members, Indigenous organizati­ons and provincial government­s.

“Based on those discussion­s, we found support for giving the inquiry more time to submit its final report, but little support for the commission’s mandate to extend beyond the next election,” Bennett said. She said the government wants to be able to respond to the inquiry’s final report before the next election in October 2019.

The inquiry’s chief commission­er, Marion Buller, responded by calling it a “sad day for all Canadians,” and accused the government of prioritizi­ng “political expediency.”

In an interview with The Canadian Press, Breen said the rejected extension means the government is “trying to kill the national inquiry in a death by a thousand cuts, and they’re trying to pin the failure on the commission­ers.”

In addition to the staffing turmoil, the inquiry has been plagued by delays. In February, the National Post reported the inquiry still had not requested files from many major police forces, including Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary, Saskatoon, Regina, Winnipeg, Toronto and Montreal — despite having promised that reviewing police conduct would be a “centrepiec­e” of its work.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada