Vancouver Sun

Social media may have passed its peak

Without legitimate gatekeeper­s, truth has evaporated, Saul Klein writes.

- Saul Klein is Dean of the Gustavson School of Business at the University of Victoria.

Social media share prices took a beating at the end of this past week, with Facebook investors losing US$120 billion of share value and Twitter ones losing US$5 billion. Both of these companies lost 20 per cent of their value in a day, along with Snapchat, which lost five per cent.

Are investors waking up to what consumers already know, that social media has passed its peak?

Facebook and Twitter have grown rapidly on the promise of greater connectivi­ty. Along with the benefits, however, the dark side of these new technologi­es has come to the surface and consumer trust is eroding quickly.

The annual Gustavson Brand Trust Index shows how social media brands are perceived by consumers. Of 299 brands surveyed in Canada in 2018, Twitter ranked 296th, Facebook ranked 295th, and Snapchat was 294th. These are also among the brands that Canadians are least likely to recommend.

If we recognize that people don’t want to do business with brands they don’t trust, the over-inflated growth projection­s of social media brands were clearly an illusion. Now that it is becoming clear that the emperor has no clothes, we should expect continuing turbulence in the social media space. Continuing large increases in subscriber growth are unlikely to materializ­e unless the companies do something about the way they are perceived.

What was once seen as the advent of a new era of free and open communicat­ions has turned into a nightmare of manipulati­on, loss of privacy and hate speech.

Rather than new media creating strong alternativ­es to traditiona­l channels and allowing a greater diversity of views, with government­s and other powerful stakeholde­rs having less control over access to informatio­n, the opposite has happened. Authoritar­ian regimes are now more able to control content and manipulate readers and viewers. Without legitimate gatekeeper­s, truth has evaporated, and it is becoming increasing­ly difficult for consumers to distinguis­h fake news from any other kind.

What was once seen as a benign tool for individual­s to stay in contact with one another, build communitie­s around common interests and share experience­s, has become a vehicle for unscrupulo­us agents to use personal informatio­n to target and shape opinion. The loss of privacy has led to interventi­on in our democratic processes and sharp increases in identity theft and online scams.

What was once seen as a boon to free speech has created a platform for vitriol and online bullying. Where we previously saw self-restraint on the expression of abhorrent opinions, reinforced by social norms, we now see impulsive and imprudent commentary and reaction. Where we wanted greater diversity of opinion, we now have greater containmen­t of views and are increasing­ly exposed only to those who share the same opinions as we do, reinforcin­g the fractional­ization of our societies.

Is it any wonder that we have lost trust in social media? In many cases, the social media brands themselves have aided and abetted the dark side. They have been slow to protect our private informatio­n, happy to sell our data to the highest bidder, and they have tried to avoid taking responsibi­lity for online abuse and the spread of hate speech.

As many other companies have come to appreciate, the route to long-term success is based on serving the needs of one’s consumers, not on manipulati­ng and exploiting them for short-term results. That requires building trusted relationsh­ips and behaving responsibl­y. Until and unless the social media brands appreciate this reality, their value is likely to continue to slide.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada