Vancouver Sun

City of Surrey removes controvers­ial light rail signs

- JENNIFER SALTMAN

City of Surrey crews were out Friday removing light rail project signs that ran afoul of Elections B.C. advertisin­g rules.

The signs are part of a city communicat­ions plan intended to educate the public about the proposed 10.5-km, $1.65-billion Surrey Newton-Guildford LRT project.

The signs bore the logos of the project funders — the federal and B.C. government­s, TransLink and the City of Surrey — and were placed near future light-rail stops.

“At the direction of Elections B.C., the City of Surrey has voluntaril­y complied and has removed all the signs for the duration of the election period,” City of Surrey deputy city solicitor Philip Huynh said in a statement.

Last week, Safe Surrey Coalition mayoral candidate Doug McCallum and council candidate Bableen Rana spoke out against the city’s draft LRT communicat­ions plan, saying the timing and content raised “serious concerns regarding bias and interferen­ce in the election.” They suggested the city might have to register as a thirdparty advertiser.

Under the Local Elections Campaign Financing Act, third-party election advertisin­g rules can apply to “a communicat­ion that takes a position on an issue associated with a candidate or elector organizati­on.”

Elections B.C. spokespers­on Andrew Watson said in an email “the LRT vs. Skytrain debate is a campaign issue associated with specific candidates” in Surrey’s election.

“We reviewed the signs in question after receiving a complaint about them. While they do not directly or indirectly support a candidate or party, they do directly support LRT in Surrey, which is an issue associated with specific candidates.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada