Vancouver Sun

Condo Boom Continues to define Vancouver

Rise of complexes drove real estate prices up, discourage­d rental buildings

- DOUGLAS TODD dtodd@postmedia.com Twitter: @douglastod­d

It was the year the Beatles released Hey Jude, Pierre Trudeau was elected prime minister, and Rev. Martin Luther King was assassinat­ed.

It was 1968 — the year that Metro Vancouver got its first condominiu­m complex.

A great deal has changed in the ensuing 50 years. Now, roughly one out of three residents of the region live in a condominiu­m. Metro Vancouver has about 600,000 condo units, with the city of Vancouver having 150,000 of those. The province has about 900,000 units, according to the Condominiu­m Homeowners Associatio­n of B.C.

Metro Vancouver could be the poster city illustrati­ng the results of the legal changes half a century ago that made condominiu­ms possible. A strong case has been made that the “condoficat­ion” of Metro Vancouver has done more than anything else to define this West Coast city. It’s come with some benefits, including for many individual owners, but the deeper structural effects have not all been pretty.

The condo metamorpho­sis has led to increased density, higher land prices, more vacant properties, more vertical neighbourh­oods, fewer purpose-built rental units, more investor owners (domestic and offshore), and discord between different kinds of condo owners and users.

The condo boom has arguably provided many people who could not afford a detached property the chance to own a less-costly dwelling through a strata title, without directly owning a private chunk of land.

And it’s clear the property laws that made condominiu­ms possible increased the density and shape of the city and its neighbourh­oods — bringing far more tower clusters and making land in general more expensive. The vast majority of Metro’s more than 1,300 highrise residentia­l towers are condominiu­m buildings.

But the expansion of condominiu­ms has also, many say, discourage­d the constructi­on of purpose-built rental buildings. Developers generally prefer constructi­ng condo complexes, since they can sell the units right away, or in advance, and realize their profits quickly. They don’t have to patiently wait years to collect their profits in rents.

One of the most intriguing pieces ever written about the condoficat­ion of Metro Vancouver, and other parts of North America, is by Douglas Harris, a specialist in legal history and property law at the University of B.C. His article is titled Condominiu­m and the City: The Rise of Property in Vancouver.

One of the many points Harris makes is that the laws that made condominiu­ms possible in Metro Vancouver contribute­d to the high-end gentrifica­tion of the city, and to some extent the squeezing out of low-income residents.

“Much of the explanatio­n for the higher prices in the last two decades lies in the influx of overseas capital and migrants,” Harris writes. “Enormous economic expansion in East Asia coupled with moments of political uncertaint­y and instabilit­y brought people and capital to North America and its west coast in particular.”

The condo phenomenon especially ignited in the late 1980s, Harris says, after the Social Credit government shocked many British Columbians by selling Vancouver’s former Expo 86 lands to one of Asia’s most wealthy businessme­n, real estate developer Li Ka-shing of Hong Kong.

People from Hong Kong, Taiwan and China became particular­ly active in the skyrocketi­ng condominiu­m market in Metro Vancouver.

“Since the 1990s, Vancouver has had the highest residentia­l housing prices in the country,” with condominiu­m law providing the mechanism that “expanded the market for land, embedded the city in internatio­nal flows of people and capital, and, by doing so, contribute­d to the rising prices,” Harris says.

While the mushroomin­g of condominiu­m units has made it possible for many residents to buy into housing options other than singlefami­ly dwellings, it has also led to conflicts between those who own them, live in them, rent them and leave them empty.

Tony Gioventu, executive director of the Condominiu­m Homeowners Associatio­n of B.C., confirms reports that have suggested almost four in 10 of the roughly 900,000 condominiu­ms in B.C. are owned by investors.

That means about 350,000 units are not lived in by those who bought them (whether using money made in Canada or transferre­d from foreign lands). A large portion of investor-owned units are rented out, Gioventu said, especially since 2010 when the B.C. Liberals allowed developers to legally designate most new units as rentable for 100 years.

Another result of investment and speculatio­n in condominiu­ms is that many units remain empty, even in the midst of Metro’s housing and rental affordabil­ity crisis. There are hundreds of condo towers in Vancouver’s downtown core, and Gioventu estimated 25 to 35 per cent of their units are vacant.

That is just one of many factors that have led to stresses: Between people who live in their condo units, those who rent them, speculator­s and recreation­al-property owners who leave them empty and investors who turn them into businesses through Airbnb.

One of the most notorious conflicts involving investorow­ners and owner-occupiers was to go this week before B.C.’s Human Rights Tribunal, but was settled out of court Monday with a nondisclos­ure agreement. It centred on condominiu­m owner Andreas Kargut’s protest against Mandarin-languageon­ly strata council meetings at his Richmond complex.

But it’s not hard to find other forms of discord between investors and owner-occupiers. An early rental study for Vancouver city council discovered complaints absentee owners were “less willing to spend on additional or unforeseen maintenanc­e” and were negligent at screening renters, some of whom crowd into small units.

While generally defending the many renters in condominiu­ms (including a large portion of the more than 100,000 internatio­nal students in Metro Vancouver), Gioventu said serious problems, if not horror shows, are arising because some investors are hawking their units as short-term Airbnb rentals.

Too many condo owners don’t realize they’re liable for all damages, complaints and illegal activities related to renters, including those who sub-rent through Airbnb, Gioventu said. Not only do some Airbnb “guests” cause noise problems, flood bathtubs and use their units for illicit purposes, a portion take advantage of their condo security access to break into storage lockers and the units of others.

It’s an understate­ment to say condominiu­ms have been a game changer in North America. Condoficat­ion has caused a revolution in urban history — and no more so than in Metro Vancouver. The story of condos is only beginning, and their consequenc­es will continue to unfold in far-reaching ways.

While the mushroomin­g of condominiu­m units has made it possible for many residents to buy into housing options other than singlefami­ly dwellings, it has also led to conflicts between those who own them, live in them, rent them and leave them empty. Douglas Todd Developers generally prefer constructi­ng condo complexes, since they can sell the units right away ... and realize their profits quickly.

 ??  ??
 ?? DARRYL DYCK/THE CANADIAN PRESS ?? There are about 600,000 condominiu­m units in Metro Vancouver, with about 150,000 of those in the city of Vancouver, which saw its first condo complex built 50 years ago and a stream of taller, more tightly packed towers since.
DARRYL DYCK/THE CANADIAN PRESS There are about 600,000 condominiu­m units in Metro Vancouver, with about 150,000 of those in the city of Vancouver, which saw its first condo complex built 50 years ago and a stream of taller, more tightly packed towers since.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada