Vancouver Sun

Nothing to see here

Nancy and friends are fundamenta­lly uninterest­ing

- DANIEL D’ADDARIO Variety.com

Nancy Drew Wednesdays, W Network

LOS ANGELES In a roundabout way, Twin Peaks may be the most influentia­l show in today’s teen TV. It’s roundabout because it’s not actually Twin Peaks, David Lynch’s brilliant, flawed soap opera about trauma, Americana, and, ultimately, itself that’s doing the influencin­g. The CW’s Riverdale, loosely based on the Archie Comics series, cracked the code that what people wanted was a show that had Twin Peaks flavour — small-town quirk, winking awareness of its own outsizedne­ss, affected nostalgia existing right next door to cynical contempora­neity — even if it wasn’t interested in, and couldn’t achieve, actual Lynch.

In borrowing from Riverdale, the new CW series Nancy Drew is borrowing from this imaginary Twin Peaks. Like its network-mate, it is leveraging an intellectu­al property known for its squareness and pumping it with raunch and an overstated air of enigma. Which wouldn’t matter if it were interestin­g. But Nancy Drew isn’t just dull, it has the misfortune of following another dull show that is much like it.

Here, the milieu is slightly aged up from Riverdale — Kennedy McMann plays a young woman who ought, according to her life plan, to be in college, but who tanked her classes after the death of her mother and who is now stuck at home. We meet her, in a voice-over that attempts to mask just how much narrative work it has to do with a sort of breezy, over-it attitude, in an assignatio­n with Ned Nickerson (who is, in the mystery book series that began in 1930, Nancy’s boyfriend).

As with so much else here, it feels like a basely obvious attempt to get attention for edge and transgress­iveness where little really exists: If a CW show not based on a book series known for its appropriat­eness for young girl early readers began with a sex scene, would anyone care?

Nancy Drew gets its jolt from the fact that it depicts Nancy Drew, a character even those unfamiliar likely perceive as prudish thanks to its time period and to a kiddie-film Emma Roberts adaptation from a decade ago. It’s a cheap and unearned bit of electricit­y, and one that tapers off as it becomes increasing­ly clear that Nancy Drew’s vision for how to modify its main character and her world extend no further than, well, Riverdale, with a central mystery rooted in the supernatur­al and with a socialite victim that both feel borrowed from the spooky and rigorously class-stratified world elsewhere on the CW’s air.

Given the degree to which Nancy Drew attempts to coast by on sheer attitude, it should come as no surprise that the mystery is fundamenta­lly uninterest­ing and that Nancy’s friends, in the show’s first two hours, are undistingu­ished.

The show is less a series with characters and plot than an attempt at a haunted mood. It may get there at times by sheer, relentless effort. But unlike the best of TV, including its second-degree influences, Nancy Drew won’t haunt you for even a moment after the episode ends.

 ??  ?? Kennedy McMann as Nancy
Kennedy McMann as Nancy

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada