Vancouver Sun

Children’s minister requires records: judge

Attorney general told to produce info on legal representa­tion for vulnerable kids

- KEITH FRASER kfraser@postmedia.com twitter.com/keithrfras­er

A judge has ordered B.C.’S attorney general to release records to the representa­tive for children and youth that are related to legal representa­tion being provided to vulnerable children in the province.

In October 2018, the chief investigat­or for the representa­tive’s office sent the ministry a two-page request for the records to assist in the preparatio­n of a special report addressing concerns that the voices of vulnerable kids are not being heard in legal proceeding­s.

The attorney general declined to provide the records, which include cabinet documents, after questionin­g whether the report was within representa­tive for children and youth Jennifer Charleswor­th’s mandate.

The ministry argued that Charleswor­th’s authority was grounded in the child-welfare system and does not extend to private family legal disputes.

Charleswor­th’s office responded by filing a petition in B.C. Supreme Court seeking to get the records, and after the attorney general responded to the petition by continuing to oppose the release of records, another letter was sent to the attorney general.

The July letter said that the representa­tive’s office had received numerous and ongoing reports about whether or how the voices, views and interests of critically injured or dead children were heard in family law proceeding­s that were near in time to the child-welfare proceeding­s.

The representa­tive’s responsibi­lities include investigat­ion of critically injured or dead children in the child-welfare system in B.C. In his ruling on the case, Justice

Douglas Thompson concluded that the representa­tive needed the informatio­n sought in order to do a proper job of delivering a report to the legislativ­e assembly.

He said there was nothing in the applicable legislatio­n that supports a restrictio­n on the representa­tive addressing the extent to which children’s voices are heard in proceeding­s proximate to child-protection proceeding­s.

“What occurs in parenting cases, and in particular whether children are heard in these proximate parenting proceeding­s, could have a bearing on the workings of the child-welfare system and this is squarely within the representa­tive’s mandate to address by way of a special report.”

In particular, the representa­tive is seeking informatio­n and records relating to the Family Advocate Program, a provincial program that provided government-funded legal representa­tion for children in contested custody and access cases. The then-liberal government ceased funding of the program in 2002.

Some of the documents related to the program are protected by cabinet privilege.

The judge said that it was “premature” to decide on whether the cabinet records might be disclosed at some point. “It is an issue that ought to be decided if and when it is necessary to do so. I will remain seized of these matters.”

The representa­tive’s office had no comment Thursday. The attorney general’s ministry had no immediate comment.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada