Waterloo Region Record

‘Financial threat against faith over’

Trump limits punitive IRS action over church political activity, but some say order too vague

- Catherine Lucey and Rachel Zoll

WASHINGTON — Declaring he was giving churches their “voices back,” United States President Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday aimed at easing an IRS rule limiting political activity for religious organizati­ons — a move that fell far short of a more sweeping order some supporters had expected.

As he marked the National Day of Prayer at the White House on Thursday, Trump signed the order on religious freedom, which directs the Treasury Department to not take “adverse action” over churches or religious organizati­ons for political speech. The rule has rarely been enforced. Still, opponents said the restrictio­ns have a chilling effect on free speech.

“This financial threat against the faith community is over,” Trump said. He has long promised the conservati­ve Christian supporters who helped him win the White House that he would block the regulation, known as the Johnson Amendment, though any repeal would have to be done by Congress.

The amendment, named for then-Sen. Lyndon Johnson, was put into force in 1954. The policy allows a wide range of advocacy on political issues, but in the case of houses of worship, it bars electionee­ring and outright political endorsemen­ts from the pulpit.

Trump’s order also asks federal agencies to consider issuing new regulation­s that the White House says could help religious groups that object to paying for contracept­ion under the Affordable Care Act health law. And it asks the attorney general to issue guidance on federal religious liberty protection­s.

The order did not match a broader, much more detailed draft leaked earlier this year that included provisions on conscience protection for faith-based ministries, schools and federal workers across an array of agencies. Robin Fretwell Wilson, a legal scholar who advises legislator­s on balancing LGBT rights and religious liberty, said the language in the document was so vague, it was unclear what impact it would have.

“I’m not seeing a lot more shield around people of faith from this,” said Wilson.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada