Waterloo Region Record

Tunnel cave-in renews nuclear safety fears

- Nicholas K. Geranios and Manuel Valdes

RICHLAND, WASH. — The collapse of a tunnel containing radioactiv­e waste at the Hanford nuclear weapons complex underscore­d what critics have long been saying: Toxic remnants of the Cold War are being stored in haphazard and unsafe conditions, and time is running out to deal with the problem.

“Unfortunat­ely, the crisis at Hanford is far from an isolated incident,” said Kevin Kamps of the anti-nuclear group Beyond Nuclear.

For instance, at the Savannah River Site in South Carolina, which opened in the 1950s and produced plutonium and tritium, the government is labouring to clean up groundwate­r contaminat­ion along with 150 million litres of radioactiv­e liquid waste stored in tanks that are decades past their projected lifespan. The job is likely to take decades.

At Hanford, in addition to the tunnel collapse discovered Tuesday, dozens of undergroun­d storage tanks, some dating to the Second World War, are leaking highly radioactiv­e materials.

The problem is that the U.S. government rushed to build nuclear weapons during the Cold War with little thought given to how to permanentl­y dispose of the resulting waste.

Safely removing it now is proving enormously expensive, slow-going, extraordin­arily dangerous and so complex that much of the technology required simply does not exist. The cleanup has also been plagued with setbacks both political and technical.

For example, the nation’s only undergroun­d nuclear waste repository, in New Mexico, closed to new shipments in 2014 after an improperly packed drum of waste ruptured. The site just recently reopened.

The U.S. Department of Energy spends about $6 billion a year on managing waste left from the production of nuclear weapons.

“The temporary solutions DOE has used for decades to contain radioactiv­e waste at Hanford have limited lifespans,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., a frequent Hanford critic. “The longer it takes to clean up Hanford, the higher the risk will be to workers, the public and the environmen­t.”

Meanwhile, thousands of workers at Hanford were told to stay home as efforts began to plug the 37-square-metre hole that opened up in the earth over the unoccupied storage tunnel.

Officials said they detected no release of radiation and no one was injured in the collapse, though thousands of workers were forced to take shelter for several hours as a precaution.

A gravel road was built to the collapse site, and workers wearing protective suits and breathing masks planned to fill the hole with 50 truckloads of dirt, the Energy Department said.

Gerry Pollet, a Washington state legislator and longtime Hanford critic, said the collapse of a tunnel at Hanford had been feared for years.

“This disaster was predicted and shows the federal Energy Department’s utter recklessne­ss in seeking decades of delay for Hanford cleanup,” he said.

He noted the Energy Department last year received permission to delay removing waste from the tunnels until 2042. The waste was supposed to be gone by 2024, Pollet said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada