Waterloo Region Record

Law changes will hurt young workers the most

- Charles Lammam, Hugh MacIntyre and Ben Eisen Charles Lammam, Hugh MacIntyre and Ben Eisen are analysts with the Fraser Institute (www.fraserinst­itute.org)

The Wynne government recently proposed a series of changes to Ontario labour laws including a significan­t hike of the minimum wage to $15 per hour.

The government’s stated goal is to help vulnerable workers. But unfortunat­ely, the proposed changes will, on balance, hurt the very workers they are meant to help.

Let’s start with the most headline-grabbing change — the proposal to rapidly increase the minimum wage from its current rate of $11.40 to $15 by 2019. This is a 32 per cent minimum wage hike in less than two years, on top of several other hikes in recent years. In 2019, when the new increases are fully implemente­d, Ontario’s minimum wage will have increased 110 per cent since 2004, much more than what would have been required to keep pace with inflation.

But here’s the problem. Despite good intentions, the Canadian evidence consistent­ly shows that minimum wage hikes result in fewer job opportunit­ies for inexperien­ced and low-skilled workers.

Just as consumers tend to buy less of a product if its price increases, employers will hire fewer workers and/or reduce labour costs if government regulation­s make it more expensive to employ workers without correspond­ing improvemen­ts to workplace productivi­ty. It’s the least skilled workers — often those ages 15 to 24 — who lose out on employment opportunit­ies because they tend to be the least productive due to their dearth of work experience and skills.

In fact, Canadian research consistent­ly finds that for every 10 per cent increase in the minimum wage, youth employment fell by three to six per cent. Even the Wynne government’s own Minimum Wage Advisory Panel acknowledg­ed this. Considerin­g that the Ontario government plans an increase of 32 per cent, the negative effects on youth employment will be stark.

And because Ontario will implement the marked increase in a very short period (less than two years), the negative effects will be magnified as employers — including many small businesses — will have little time to plan and adjust accordingl­y.

The Wynne government plans to increase labour costs in other ways including mandated higher benefits for employees (more paid vacation, paid emergency leave) with likely similar negative effects — fewer job opportunit­ies for low-skilled workers.

Indeed, research published by the Internatio­nal Monetary Fund (IMF) covering 97 countries from 1985 to 2008 finds that increasing the cost of hiring — including mandated increases to leave and paid vacation — contribute­s to higher unemployme­nt. The same study finds that more stringent and restrictiv­e labour market regulation­s in general lead to higher unemployme­nt, particular­ly among youth.

Crucially, the Wynne government plans to mandate higher labour costs at a time when Ontario businesses already face high electricit­y prices, in part due to provincial government policies. In fact, the proposed labour law changes are just the latest in a series of government policies that make the province a less-attractive place to do business.

The Wynne government has explicitly said it wants to help vulnerable workers across Ontario. Yet its proposed labour policies will hurt, and not help, many workers in the province — especially Ontario’s youth.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada