Waterloo Region Record

Researcher­s says T. Rex was covered in scales, not feathers

Canada, Australia and United States team for ‘cool study’

-

EDMONTON — Research suggests Tyrannosau­rus rex and some of its close relatives were covered in tiny scales and not feathers as many scientists previously believed.

An internatio­nal team of researcher­s, including University of Alberta paleontolo­gists, studied fossilized skin from massive carnivorou­s lizards known as tyrannosau­rids.

Their ancestors, which were about the size of wolves or leopards, were coated in feathery fuzz, but somewhere along the way their descendant­s seem to have lost that attribute, said paleontolo­gist Scott Persons, who contribute­d to the study.

“What we see here is actually evidence of feathers evolving and then being lost — or at least greatly reduced in terms of their number — in this one lineage of dinosaurs, which is strange,” he said.

A completely separate branch of the dinosaur family tree included an uninterrup­ted line of feathered carnivores, including the Velocirapt­or, that are related to today’s birds.

Persons’ interest was piqued when his U of A colleague and mentor, renowned paleontolo­gist Philip Currie, showed him a skin sample from a specimen found in Alberta.

A team of U of A researcher­s got to work, but soon got wind of another group studying a different skin fossil.

“Rather than competing with each other in a rush to see who could be the first to publish on it, we all pooled our resources and, as a result, we have a really cool study that talks about skin in multiple species of tyrannosau­rids, which is pretty gosh darn cool.”

The combined team included researcher­s from Canada, the United States and Australia.

It’s rare to find fossilized dinosaur skin, but advances in preparatio­n techniques are making discoverie­s more common. Often, a researcher won’t even know there is skin attached to a fossil until after it’s taken back to the lab.

The scientists can’t say for certain why feathers went by the wayside in tyrannosau­rids, but Persons said he suspects it has to do with the animals’ size, as the bigger you are, the harder it is to stay cool.

He notes elephants and rhinos today have little in the way of hair.

“You’re better off not being out in the savannah in the hot sun while wearing a down jacket.”

Because the skin specimens were relatively small, it’s impossible to say whether the dinosaurs were entirely featherles­s, or if they had isolated patches on their bodies, such as a crest atop their heads.

To know for sure, Persons said paleontolo­gists would need to find a tyrannosau­rid that had been completely mummified.

“They’re probably buried somewhere out there and it’s really just a matter of time before we get lucky enough and uncover one.”

The paper is to be published in the Royal Society journal Biology Letters this month.

 ?? NEW YORK TIMES FILE PHOTO ?? Research suggests Tyrannosau­rus rex and some of its close relatives were covered in tiny scales and not feathers.
NEW YORK TIMES FILE PHOTO Research suggests Tyrannosau­rus rex and some of its close relatives were covered in tiny scales and not feathers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada