Waterloo Region Record

Serenity and grit

Jennifer Lawrence radiates in the enigmatic Mother!

- Ann Hornada The Washington Post

‘Mother!,” Darren Aronofsky’s tour de force of allegorica­l misdirecti­on, is about many things, in succession and simultaneo­usly. What begins as a creepily insinuatin­g chamber piece of domestic discord quickly takes on more metaphoric­al meanings, with drama giving way to outright horror: Here, a parable of marital anxiety becomes a lurid, Boschlike meditation on environmen­tal destructio­n, idolatry and — ultimately — blind devotion to a greedy and insatiable god.

Mostly, though, this intriguing but ultimately frustratin­gly undiscipli­ned experiment is about Jennifer Lawrence, who proves once again what a supernatur­al screen presence she is, delivering a performanc­e of transparen­cy, stillness, physical grit and self-sacrificin­g courage. As the enigmatic title character, she’s our surrogate and guide through the highly charged environmen­t Aronofsky has conceived: In this case, it’s an elegant Victorian house, standing regally in a serene field, that Lawrence’s character is restoring as an idyllic home and creative cocoon for her husband, a famous poet played by Javier Bardem.

Fans of “The Shining” will think they have “Mother!” sussed when Bardem turns out to be blocked and when Lawrence’s wary but radiant heroine begins to sense a beating heart underneath the house’s sturdy bones. But then a strange couple — played in wickedly observant turns by Ed Harris and Michelle Pfeiffer — shows up, injecting a malign, anarchic force reminiscen­t of Sidney Blackmer and Ruth Gordon in “Rosemary’s Baby.”

And, yes, a Polanskian air of maternal dread — the primal fear of loss of control and privacy — suffuses “Mother!,” which at its most astute and provocativ­e could be a mirror to Aronofsky’s own ambivalenc­e about fame. Specifical­ly, he seems to be zeroing in on auteur worship, parasitic fandom and women playing muse, vessel and protective space-maker for male genius. Lawrence, who exudes a stunning combinatio­n of innocence and watchful wisdom, pads through the characters’ eight-sided house with the same alarm as Mia Farrow four decades ago, but also with more assurance and self-possession as the stakes of her fight become not just higher, but surreally so.

But even Lawrence’s magnetic powers can’t keep “Mother!” from going off the rails, which at first occurs cumulative­ly, then in a mad rush during the film’s outlandish climax. Shot by Aronofsky’s frequent cinematogr­apher Matthew Libatique with the intimate close-ups familiar from “Black Swan” and “The Fighter,” this is a movie whose sense of claustroph­obia becomes woozily stifling, its dreamlike shots and pans, always from Lawrence’s point of view, growing more nauseating by the minute.

As the visual language becomes increasing­ly nightmaris­h, the message of “Mother!” becomes exponentia­lly more obscure. There’s a Cain-and-Abel subplot suggesting that Aronofsky wasn’t finished with the Old Testament after his 2014 movie “Noah,” but then again, maybe this is his own viscerally graphic version of the Jesus story. Or, as he has intimated in comments to the press, perhaps this is the cri de coeur of an artist overwhelme­d by environmen­tal, social and cultural destructio­n.

Whichever it is, “Mother!” seems assured to divide the filmmaker’s fans, many of whom will celebrate another audacious statement from a master of cinema as dreamscape of our darkest unconsciou­s, but some of whom will think he misses the mark in the interest of pulp excess and flamboyanc­e. Wherever you land on that spectrum, it’s difficult to argue that, while it lasts, “Mother!” flies its freak flag with intensity that is bracing, febrile and uncompromi­sing.

 ??  ??
 ?? THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ?? Even Jennifer Lawrence’s wonderful acting can’t keep “Mother!” from going off the rails.
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Even Jennifer Lawrence’s wonderful acting can’t keep “Mother!” from going off the rails.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada